Namespace vs Claude Managed Agents

Namespace rents you machines: CI runners and Devboxes on Linux, macOS and Windows, which stop after 4 to 24 hours. Claude Managed Agents rents you an agent: Anthropic runs Claude in a small container it manages, and you talk to it through an events API.

The companies and products

Namespace

Namespace is a dev platform for fast builds, tests and coding environments: CI runners, build caches and Devboxes, on its own hardware.

Most of Namespace is CI: a faster drop-in for GitHub Actions runners, with Docker, Bazel, Turborepo and Nix caching. Its Devboxes are remote Linux and macOS machines with persistent storage, made for people and AI coding agents, and they also host sessions for Claude Managed Agents, Cursor Cloud Agents and Devin. It is a different kind of product from bochka, so this page compares the part where they overlap: a machine an agent works on.

Claude Managed Agents

Claude Managed Agents is Anthropic's ready-made agent harness: Claude runs as an autonomous agent in a cloud sandbox that Anthropic manages, and you talk to it through an events API.

This is an agent platform, not a sandbox you rent. You define an agent (model, prompt, tools, MCP servers, skills) and an environment, then start sessions, send messages as events and stream back what Claude does; the harness handles tool calls, prompt caching and compaction. Each session gets its own Ubuntu container, or runs its tools on a worker you host yourself. It is built for teams that want Claude doing long tasks without building their own agent loop or sandbox.

Which use cases each one fits

For each use case, Battleships prices every sandbox provider on the same workload and sorts them from the cheapest monthly bill up. “80th cheapest of 377” means 79 of the other 376 providers run that workload, with every feature it needs, for less. “With limits” means the provider runs it but misses something, so it is listed after every full match. Open a use case for its whole ranking and what each provider misses.

Use case and its workloadNamespace: price rankClaude Managed Agents: price rankbochka: price rank
Software factory
100 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 2,200 sessions of 8 h a month
Namespace gives a coding agent a Devbox with Docker but stops it after 4 to 24 hours, and Managed Agents gives it a container with up to 8 GB of memory and Docker only in limited availability; bochka gives a full VM with no session cap.
39th of 367, with limits
$3,495 a month
106th of 367, with limits
$964 a month
3rd cheapest of 367
$634 a month
Always-on AI employees
50 machines 24/7 · 2 vCPU / 4 GB
Neither fits cleanly: a Namespace Devbox is shut down after at most 24 hours, and a Managed Agents sandbox keeps its state only 30 days after it is created; bochka has no session cap on paid plans.
303rd of 366, with limits
$6,645 a month
219th of 366, with limits
$2,511 a month
5th cheapest of 366
$657 a month
Code interpreter bursts
100 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 200,000 sessions of 1 min a month
Namespace bills per minute with no plan fee and Managed Agents bills runtime only while the agent works, so both handle short bursts well, while bochka's start limits make big bursts a compromise.
247th of 345, with limits
$250 a month
163rd of 345, with limits
$756 a month
186th of 345, with limits
$2,000 a month
Sandboxes for your users
300 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 30,000 sessions of 23 min a month
Your users cannot open a Managed Agents sandbox, which has no inbound ports, and Namespace URLs need a Namespace login; bochka gives each sandbox token-protected HTTPS URLs on up to 50 ports.
284th of 361, with limits
$2,068 a month
231st of 361, with limits
$823 a month
Cheapest of 361
$209 a month
RL rollouts
1,000 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 1,000,000 sessions of 3 min a month
356th of 360, with limits
$9,012 a month
252nd of 360, with limits
$3,978 a month
34th of 360, with limits
$2,000 a month
Agent evals
250 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 15,000 sessions of 20 min a month
282nd of 364, with limits
$1,043 a month
244th of 364, with limits
$320 a month
10th cheapest of 364
$200 a month
CI runners
40 at once · 8 vCPU / 16 GB · 6,000 sessions of 12 min a month
CI is Namespace's main product, with runners and caches for Docker, Bazel and more; Managed Agents is not a CI service, and bochka runs CI jobs on full VMs with Docker and /dev/kvm.
80th cheapest of 377
$765 a month
227th of 377, with limits
$96 a month
4th cheapest of 377
$86 a month
24/7 dev boxes
1 machine 24/7 · 4 vCPU / 8 GB
A Namespace Devbox stops when idle and wakes on connect but is shut down after at most 24 hours, and Managed Agents has no SSH at all; a bochka machine stays up as long as you want.
126th of 368, with limits
$168 a month
224th of 368, with limits
$48 a month
18th cheapest of 368
$26 a month
Computer-use agents
50 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 20,000 sessions of 15 min a month
Namespace's screenshot and click API works on macOS Devboxes only, and Managed Agents has headless Chromium but no desktop; bochka streams a 60fps Linux desktop with computer use.
67th of 369, with limits
$982 a month
127th of 369, with limits
$288 a month
6th cheapest of 369
$200 a month
Browser-use agents
50 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 30,000 sessions of 10 min a month
285th of 367, with limits
$789 a month
126th of 367, with limits
$288 a month
7th cheapest of 367
$200 a month
Scraping & bots (startup scale)
50 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 100,000 sessions of 3 min a month
259th of 346, with limits
$332 a month
127th of 346, with limits
$390 a month
6th cheapest of 346
$90 a month
Mass scraping & bots (undetectable)
1,000 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 3,000,000 sessions of 2 min a month
226th of 338, with limits
$9,012 a month
155th of 338, with limits
$4,798 a month
71st of 338, with limits
$1,800 a month
Parallel red teaming
200 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 5,000 sessions of 30 min a month
242nd of 360, with limits
$339 a month
179th of 360, with limits
$160 a month
2nd cheapest of 360
$200 a month
GPU eval jobs
10 at once · 8 vCPU / 32 GB · 500 sessions of 30 min a month
Can't run itCan't run itCan't run it
macOS agents
5 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 1,000 sessions of 20 min a month
Only Namespace fits: it runs macOS on Apple Silicon, while Managed Agents and bochka run Linux only.
6th cheapest of 36
$1,205 a month
Can't run itCan't run it

Key features

FeatureNamespaceClaude Managed Agentsbochka
What it isA build and dev platform: CI runners, build caches, Devboxes and a compute APIA hosted Claude agent: Anthropic's harness runs Claude in a sandbox and you send it eventsA sandbox platform: each agent gets its own full Linux VM, with coding agents built in
IsolationLinux Devboxes run from a container image on Namespace's own hardware; the docs do not say if each has its own kernelIsolated Linux container per sessionFull VM with its own kernel on dedicated AMD Ryzen 9 9950X hosts
Machine sizeDevbox sizes from 4 vCPU / 8 GB up, billed in more Devbox Minutes for bigger sizes; vCPU is a burst ceilingUp to 8 GB memory and 10 GB disk; vCPU not published; not configurableUp to 16 vCPU / 32 GB on the $100 plan and above
Docker and /dev/kvmDocker in Linux Devboxes; /dev/kvm on Linux compute instances, not on macOS or WindowsDocker listed as limited availability; root, systemd and /dev/kvm not documentedRoot, Docker, systemd and /dev/kvm on every machine
How long a session can runDevboxes are shut down after 4, 5 or 24 hours by plan, even while you work; 24 hours at mostNo session cap published; idle sessions sleep and resume on the next messageNo session cap on paid plans
What persistsA stopped Devbox keeps its storage, billed at $0.20 per GB-month usedSandbox is checkpointed when a session goes idle; state is kept only 30 days after the sandbox is createdThe whole disk, saved every minute and on stop; a stopped sandbox costs nothing
Idle stop and wakeDevboxes stop after an idle timeout (15 minutes to 8 hours) and start again when you connectIdle sessions are not billed and resume from their checkpoint on the next messageMachines run until you stop them; a stopped sandbox is started by API
ForkNo fork; compute instances can suspend and resume with RAM keptNo fork or clone of a session or sandboxFork a running sandbox into a new one with its disk
Reaching the sandboxHTTPS URLs that need a Namespace login, TCP through a running CLI port-forward; no public IPNo inbound ports or SSH; reached only through the sessions and events APIToken-protected HTTPS URLs for up to 50 ports, raw TCP, SSH, dedicated IPv6 or IPv4
Browser and desktopScreenshot and click API on macOS Devboxes only; VNC and RDP for compute instancesHeadless Chromium with Playwright; no desktop or computer-use tool60fps Linux desktop with Chromium, computer use and browser control, embeddable stream
AgentsHosts Claude Managed Agents, Cursor and Devin sessions run by those partners; an MCP server lets your agent create DevboxesAnthropic's harness with Claude models only: events, steering, interrupts, multiagent threads, memory stores and webhooksClaude Code, Codex, OpenCode and more preinstalled, driven from outside with a prompt, steer and events API
Outbound rulesEgress policies per Devbox blueprint, runner or instance: block, advisory or allow by domainUnrestricted, or limited to listed hosts plus optional package registries and MCP serversOpen internet on every plan; no provider-side allowlist
Keeping keys out of the sandboxEgress rules inject a header from Namespace Vault, resolved outside the workloadVault secrets sit in the sandbox as placeholders and are swapped in at egress, per hostAI credentials proxy for model providers and any HTTPS API; switch a credential to another account when credits run out
Operating systemsLinux, macOS on Apple Silicon, and Windows on Team plans and upUbuntu 24.04 on x86_64 onlyLinux only; Wine for Windows apps
Every feature Battleships tracks (43)
FeatureNamespaceClaude Managed Agentsbochka
Full VM (own kernel)YesNoYes
Docker insideYesNot publishedYes
Nested virtualizationYesNoYes
RootYesNot publishedYes
SystemdNot publishedNot publishedYes
Desktop GUIYesNoYes
BrowserNoYesYes
Computer-use APIYesNoYes
SSHYesNoYes
Persistent diskYesYesYes
Pause/resumeYesYesYes
Automatic snapshotsYesYesYes
Fork/cloneNoNoYes
Live fork (no pause)NoNoYes
Memory forkNoNoNo
Custom image (Docker or snapshot)YesYesYes
≥24 h sessionsYesYesYes
Idle auto-stopYesYesNo
Wake on requestYesYesNo
HTTPS preview URLsYesNoYes
Raw TCP inboundYesNoYes
Public IPv4NoNoNo
Egress allowlistYesYesNo
Secret proxyYesYesYes
Secret proxy for any APIYesYesYes
Preinstalled agentsYesYesYes
Agent harness APINoYesYes
MCP serverYesYesNo
GPUNoNoNo
WindowsYesNoNo
Arm64YesNoNo
Self-hostingNoYesNo
BYOCNoYesNo
Open sourceNoNoNo
Scoped API keysNot publishedNot publishedYes
Spend limitsYesYesYes
Usage per sandbox (API)NoYesYes
Audit logsYesNot publishedNo
SSOYesYesNo
SOC 2YesYesNo
HIPAANoNoNo
EU data residencyYesNoYes
Zero data retentionNot publishedNoYes

Performance

Namespace21.79 runs/s
Claude Managed AgentsNot measured
bochka26.69 runs/s

In StarSling's public run of 2026-09-29, at 4 vCPU / 8 GB, bochka did 26.69 Node.js build-and-test runs per second and Namespace did 21.79, so the same build takes about a fifth longer on Namespace. Claude Managed Agents was not measured, and Anthropic does not publish how many vCPUs its sandbox gets. On Managed Agents, much of a session's time is spent waiting on the model rather than the CPU.

Node.js build-and-test loop at 4 vCPU / 8 GB, higher is better. Measured with the open hpc-sandbox-benchmarks suite. Namespace measured on: Linux compute instance (unit-minutes, PAYG/overage $0.0015). Claude Managed Agents has no published run in this suite yet, so there is no like-for-like number to compare.

Pricing in five scenarios

Each bill is priced from the providers' public price lists by the open Battleships engine, with the cheapest plan that runs the scenario.

ScenarioNamespace, a monthClaude Managed Agents, a monthbochka, a month
One coding agent, workdays
4 vCPU / 8 GB, 50 GB disk, 8 hours a day, 22 days a month, files kept between days
$50 · Devbox (pay as you go)$13 · Claude API (pay-as-you-go, usage tiers) · with limits$20 · $20/mo
One agent that never stops
4 vCPU / 8 GB, 50 GB disk, running 24/7 all month
$176 · Devbox (pay as you go) · with limits$53 · Claude API (pay-as-you-go, usage tiers) · with limits$26 · $20/mo
50 agents in parallel
50 machines of 4 vCPU / 8 GB at once, 8-hour sessions, 1,100 sessions a month, Docker inside
$2,198 · Devbox (pay as you go)$634 · Claude API (pay-as-you-go, usage tiers) · with limits$317 · $20/mo × 3 seats
Sandboxes for your users
2 vCPU / 4 GB, 30,000 sessions of 10 minutes a month, up to 300 at once
$1,214 · Devbox (pay as you go)$360 · Claude API (pay-as-you-go, usage tiers) · with limits$200 · $100/mo × 2 seats
1,000 short jobs at once
2 vCPU / 4 GB, 1,000 at once, 3 minutes each, 200,000 jobs a month
$3,237 · Devbox (pay as you go)$796 · Claude API (pay-as-you-go, usage tiers) · with limits$2,000 · $2000/mo · with limits

Namespace: Devboxes are billed in Devbox Minutes at $0.004 each, pay as you go on every plan; a 4 vCPU / 8 GB Devbox uses one a minute. Plan minutes cover runners and instances, not Devboxes, and stored files cost $0.20 per GB-month.

Claude Managed Agents: Managed Agents bills model tokens at API rates plus a session runtime fee, metered to the millisecond only while the session runs, including time waiting on the model. The tables show runtime only; tokens come on top and usually cost more.

Claude Managed Agents: Plans start at $20 a month, and the whole fee is usage credit spent per second while a sandbox runs. A stopped sandbox costs nothing and keeps its disk.

Limits in those scenarios

On Namespace the limit that bites is time: a Devbox is shut down after 4, 5 or 24 hours by plan, so an agent that never stops restarts at least once a day, and Namespace publishes no egress price. On Managed Agents it is the box: up to 8 GB of memory and 10 GB of disk, an unpublished vCPU count and Docker in limited availability, so no scenario counts as a clean fit, and usage-tier spend limits pause all API use when reached. bochka has no session cap, but at 1,000 short jobs at once the $2,000 plan queues starts above 90 per minute and allows 2,400 starts a day.

ScenarioNamespaceClaude Managed Agentsbochka
One coding agent, workdays
  • egress price not published
  • adjacent product, not a like-for-like sandbox
  • machine size not published
  • different kind of product: agent-platform
  • machine size per session not published
None that bite
One agent that never stops
  • sessions end after 24 h: needs restarts to run 24/7
  • egress price not published
  • adjacent product, not a like-for-like sandbox
  • machine size not published
  • different kind of product: agent-platform
  • machine size per session not published
None that bite
50 agents in parallel
  • egress price not published
  • adjacent product, not a like-for-like sandbox
  • not confirmed: Docker inside
  • machine size not published
  • different kind of product: agent-platform
None that bite
Sandboxes for your users
  • egress price not published
  • adjacent product, not a like-for-like sandbox
  • machine size not published
  • different kind of product: agent-platform
  • not confirmed: how many machines can run at once (you need 300; the typical published limit is 50)
None that bite
1,000 short jobs at once
  • egress price not published
  • adjacent product, not a like-for-like sandbox
  • machine size not published
  • different kind of product: agent-platform
  • not confirmed: how many machines can run at once (you need 1,000; the typical published limit is 50)
  • max 2,400 starts/day (needs ~6,667)
  • max 600 starts/hour (needs ~1,000)
  • bursts above 90 starts/min are queued (a burst of 333 takes ~4 min to start)

Which one should you use?

Use Namespace when

you need macOS or Windows machines, faster GitHub Actions runners with build caches, or Devboxes for people that stop when idle.

  • macOS and Windows machines. Useful if your agents build iOS or Mac apps or test on Windows: Namespace runs macOS on Apple Silicon and Windows machines.
  • CI runners and build caches. Useful if you want faster GitHub Actions: Namespace is a drop-in runner with Docker, Bazel, Turborepo and Nix caching.
  • Machines you control. Useful if you want the box itself: a Devbox from any container image, with Docker, SSH and a choice of agent partners.

Use Claude Managed Agents when

you want Claude itself doing long, mostly text and code tasks with no harness to build, free idle time, and the option to run tools on your own workers.

  • No agent loop to build. Teams that want Claude doing long tasks get the harness, caching, compaction, memory and webhooks ready to use.
  • Idle time costs nothing. Agents that wait a long time between messages pay runtime only while working, and resume on the next message.
  • Tools on your own workers. Teams with strict rules can run every tool call on their own infrastructure, including a Namespace Devbox, while Anthropic orchestrates.

Where bochka fits

Namespace gives you a machine that stops within a day, and Claude Managed Agents gives you Claude in a small container you cannot open. If your agents need a real Linux machine that keeps running, with Docker, a desktop, ports you can share and the agent of your choice, look at bochka.

No clock on the work

A Namespace Devbox is shut down after at most 24 hours, even mid-task, and a Managed Agents sandbox loses its state 30 days after it is created. On bochka there is no session cap, and the disk is saved every minute.

A whole VM, not a small box

Managed Agents caps a sandbox at 8 GB of memory with Docker in limited availability, and a Namespace Devbox has /dev/kvm only on compute instances. Every bochka sandbox is a full VM with its own kernel, Docker, systemd and /dev/kvm.

Open and watch what it builds

A Managed Agents sandbox has no inbound ports, and Namespace URLs need a Namespace login, with no Linux display API. bochka gives token-protected HTTPS URLs on up to 50 ports and a 60fps Linux desktop you can share.

Use bochka when your agents need a real Linux machine for hours or days: a full, faster VM with no session cap, Docker and /dev/kvm, a 60fps desktop, ports you can open, and coding agents you drive from outside. Compare it one to one: bochka vs Namespace and bochka vs Claude Managed Agents.

Questions people ask

Is Namespace cheaper than Claude Managed Agents?

For machine time alone, Managed Agents runtime costs less in all five scenarios we priced, for example $53 against $176 for one agent running all month. But Managed Agents adds model tokens on top, which usually cost more than the runtime, and its small container does not fit any scenario cleanly. On bochka the same always-on agent comes to $26 a month.

Which is faster, Namespace or Claude Managed Agents?

Only Namespace has a comparable measurement: 21.79 Node.js build-and-test runs per second at 4 vCPU / 8 GB, against 26.69 on bochka. Anthropic does not publish the vCPU count of a Managed Agents sandbox, and it was not in the benchmark.

Can Claude Managed Agents run on Namespace?

Yes. Namespace says its Devboxes host Claude Managed Agents sessions, and Anthropic's self-hosted sandboxes let tools run on workers outside Anthropic while it keeps the orchestration. A self-hosted worker needs only a Linux host with bash and outbound HTTPS, so a bochka VM can run one too.

Can Namespace or Claude Managed Agents run Docker?

Namespace Linux Devboxes include Docker, and its Linux compute instances also have /dev/kvm. Managed Agents lists Docker as limited availability and does not document root, systemd or /dev/kvm. Every bochka sandbox has root, Docker, systemd and /dev/kvm.

How long can a session run on each?

A Namespace Devbox is shut down after 4, 5 or 24 hours by plan, even while you work. Managed Agents publishes no session cap, but sandbox state is kept only 30 days after the sandbox is created. bochka has no session cap on paid plans.

Where does my data run?

Managed Agents stores data and runs code in the US only today. Namespace runs in several regions, and keeping every workload in one region needs its enterprise plan. bochka runs only in the EU (Germany, Finland and France), with a zero data retention option.

Try bochka

Install the CLI, then run bochka new.

Product preview

More comparisons

Bochka product preview · Pricing, benchmarks and commands are illustrative. Sandbox provisioning is not connected.