Blaxel vs Namespace

Blaxel is built for agent products that start many sandboxes and keep them asleep most of the time, waking in under 25 ms with memory intact. Namespace is mainly a CI and build platform whose Devboxes give people and coding agents Linux, macOS or Windows machines for up to 24 hours at a time.

The companies and products

Blaxel

Blaxel is a San Francisco company that runs cloud infrastructure for AI agents, and since September 2026 it is part of Baseten.

You get sandboxes, batch jobs, MCP server hosting and a model gateway. Each sandbox is a Firecracker microVM with its own kernel that drops to standby when nothing is connected and resumes in under 25 ms with its memory and running processes. It is built for agent products that start many sandboxes and want them asleep most of the time.

Namespace

Namespace is a dev platform for fast builds, tests and coding environments: CI runners, build caches and Devboxes, on its own hardware.

Most of Namespace is CI: a faster drop-in for GitHub Actions runners, with Docker, Bazel, Turborepo and Nix caching. Its Devboxes are remote Linux and macOS machines with persistent storage, made for people and AI coding agents, and they also host sessions for Claude Managed Agents, Cursor Cloud Agents and Devin. It is a different kind of product from bochka, so this page compares the part where they overlap: a machine an agent works on.

Which use cases each one fits

For each use case, Battleships prices every sandbox provider on the same workload and sorts them from the cheapest monthly bill up. “10th cheapest of 367” means 9 of the other 366 providers run that workload, with every feature it needs, for less. “With limits” means the provider runs it but misses something, so it is listed after every full match. Open a use case for its whole ranking and what each provider misses.

Use case and its workloadBlaxel: price rankNamespace: price rankbochka: price rank
Software factory
100 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 2,200 sessions of 8 h a month
Blaxel fits a software factory fully while Namespace is a compromise because a Devbox stops after at most 24 hours; bochka adds /dev/kvm and a real disk on a full VM.
10th cheapest of 367
$2,373 a month
39th of 367, with limits
$3,495 a month
3rd cheapest of 367
$634 a month
Always-on AI employees
50 machines 24/7 · 2 vCPU / 4 GB
An assistant that never stops fits on Blaxel, which sleeps and wakes on request, but not on Namespace, which shuts a Devbox down after at most 24 hours; bochka has no session cap on paid plans.
12th cheapest of 366
$2,832 a month
303rd of 366, with limits
$6,645 a month
5th cheapest of 366
$657 a month
Code interpreter bursts
100 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 200,000 sessions of 1 min a month
Blaxel is the best pick of the three here: short runs that sleep right away and resume in milliseconds are what it is built for.
14th cheapest of 345
$144 a month
247th of 345, with limits
$250 a month
186th of 345, with limits
$2,000 a month
Sandboxes for your users
300 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 30,000 sessions of 23 min a month
Blaxel's public tiers stop at 200 sandboxes at once and Namespace bills each one as a Devbox, while bochka fits 300 users at once on a self-serve plan.
101st of 361, with limits
$926 a month
284th of 361, with limits
$2,068 a month
Cheapest of 361
$209 a month
RL rollouts
1,000 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 1,000,000 sessions of 3 min a month
77th of 360, with limits
$4,378 a month
356th of 360, with limits
$9,012 a month
34th of 360, with limits
$2,000 a month
Agent evals
250 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 15,000 sessions of 20 min a month
136th of 364, with limits
$704 a month
282nd of 364, with limits
$1,043 a month
10th cheapest of 364
$200 a month
CI runners
40 at once · 8 vCPU / 16 GB · 6,000 sessions of 12 min a month
All three fit, and CI runners with Docker, Bazel and Turborepo caches are Namespace's main product.
57th cheapest of 377
$431 a month
80th cheapest of 377
$765 a month
4th cheapest of 377
$86 a month
24/7 dev boxes
1 machine 24/7 · 4 vCPU / 8 GB
Both are compromises: Blaxel has no native SSH and Namespace stops a Devbox after at most 24 hours, while a bochka machine is one you SSH into and leave on.
265th of 368, with limits
$114 a month
126th of 368, with limits
$168 a month
18th cheapest of 368
$26 a month
Computer-use agents
50 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 20,000 sessions of 15 min a month
Blaxel runs a desktop and a browser on Linux, while Namespace's screenshot and click API works on macOS Devboxes only; bochka streams a 60fps Linux desktop you can embed.
14th cheapest of 369
$634 a month
67th of 369, with limits
$982 a month
6th cheapest of 369
$200 a month
Browser-use agents
50 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 30,000 sessions of 10 min a month
16th cheapest of 367
$317 a month
285th of 367, with limits
$789 a month
7th cheapest of 367
$200 a month
Scraping & bots (startup scale)
50 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 100,000 sessions of 3 min a month
16th cheapest of 346
$215 a month
259th of 346, with limits
$332 a month
6th cheapest of 346
$90 a month
Mass scraping & bots (undetectable)
1,000 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 3,000,000 sessions of 2 min a month
147th of 338, with limits
$4,292 a month
226th of 338, with limits
$9,012 a month
71st of 338, with limits
$1,800 a month
Parallel red teaming
200 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 5,000 sessions of 30 min a month
3rd cheapest of 360
$217 a month
242nd of 360, with limits
$339 a month
2nd cheapest of 360
$200 a month
GPU eval jobs
10 at once · 8 vCPU / 32 GB · 500 sessions of 30 min a month
Can't run itCan't run itCan't run it
macOS agents
5 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 1,000 sessions of 20 min a month
Only Namespace fits: it runs macOS on Apple Silicon, and neither Blaxel nor bochka has macOS.
Can't run it6th cheapest of 36
$1,205 a month
Can't run it

Key features

FeatureBlaxelNamespacebochka
IsolationFirecracker microVM per sandbox, own kernelLinux Devboxes run from a container image on Namespace's own hardware; the docs do not say if each has its own kernelFull VM with its own kernel on dedicated AMD Ryzen 9 9950X hosts
CPU speed (Node.js build-and-test, 4 vCPU / 8 GB)19.48 runs/s21.79 runs/s26.69 runs/s
How long a session can runNo forced limit on an active sandbox; Tier 0 and 1 delete sandboxes after 7 or 30 daysDevboxes stop after 4, 5 or 24 hours by plan, even while you work; 24 hours at mostNo session cap on paid plans
Idle sleep and wakeStandby a few seconds after the last connection, wakes in under 25 ms with memory and processesDevboxes stop after an idle timeout (15 minutes to 8 hours) and start again when you connectMachines run until you stop them; resume boots the VM again from disk
Nested virtualizationNo: Firecracker guests do not get /dev/kvm/dev/kvm on Linux compute instances, not on macOS or Windows/dev/kvm on every machine, so Android emulators and VMs run inside
Files and diskFiles live in memory (about half the RAM); one volume can be attached at creationA stopped Devbox keeps its storage, billed at $0.20 per GB-month usedA real disk, snapshotted every minute and on stop; a stopped sandbox costs nothing
ForkFork with memory and running processes (private preview)No fork; compute instances can suspend and resume with RAM keptFork a running sandbox (disk) into a new one
Custom imagesCustom images built from Docker imagesAny container image you choose, plus Devbox blueprintsNamed snapshots (templates), shareable by code; no Dockerfile builds
Reaching the sandboxPreview URL per port, public or token-protected; no raw TCP or public IPHTTPS URLs that need a Namespace login, TCP through a running CLI port-forward; no public IPHTTPS URLs for up to 50 ports, token-protected; raw TCP; dedicated IPv6 or IPv4
Outbound rulesDomain allow and deny lists, method and path rules, static egress IPsEgress policies by domain per Devbox blueprint, runner or instance, with an advisory modeOpen internet; filter inside the VM with nftables
Desktop and computer useDesktop and browser in the sandbox, with computer use and browser controlScreenshot and click API on macOS Devboxes only; VNC and RDP for compute instances60fps Linux desktop and Chromium, computer use and browser control, embeddable stream
Coding agentsClaude Code image you drive from its terminal or your own harnessHosts Claude Managed Agents, Cursor and Devin sessions run by those partners; an MCP server for your own agentClaude Code, Codex, OpenCode and more preinstalled, with a prompt, steer and events API
Operating systemsLinux onlyLinux, macOS on Apple Silicon, and Windows on Team plans and upLinux only; Wine for Windows apps
RegionsOregon, North Virginia, London, FrankfurtSeveral regions; ask support for a preferred one, and region-only residency needs EnterpriseEU only: Germany, Finland, France, with EU data residency
Every feature Battleships tracks (43)
FeatureBlaxelNamespacebochka
Full VM (own kernel)YesYesYes
Docker insideYesYesYes
Nested virtualizationNoYesYes
RootYesYesYes
SystemdNoNot publishedYes
Desktop GUIYesYesYes
BrowserYesNoYes
Computer-use APIYesYesYes
SSHNoYesYes
Persistent diskYesYesYes
Pause/resumeYesYesYes
Automatic snapshotsYesYesYes
Fork/cloneYesNoYes
Live fork (no pause)YesNoYes
Memory forkYesNoNo
Custom image (Docker or snapshot)YesYesYes
≥24 h sessionsYesYesYes
Idle auto-stopYesYesNo
Wake on requestYesYesNo
HTTPS preview URLsYesYesYes
Raw TCP inboundNoYesYes
Public IPv4NoNoNo
Egress allowlistYesYesNo
Secret proxyYesYesYes
Secret proxy for any APIYesYesYes
Preinstalled agentsYesYesYes
Agent harness APINoNoYes
MCP serverYesYesNo
GPUNoNoNo
WindowsNoYesNo
Arm64NoYesNo
Self-hostingNoNoNo
BYOCYesNoNo
Open sourceNoNoNo
Scoped API keysYesNot publishedYes
Spend limitsNoYesYes
Usage per sandbox (API)YesNoYes
Audit logsNot publishedYesNo
SSOYesYesNo
SOC 2YesYesNo
HIPAAYesNoNo
EU data residencyYesYesYes
Zero data retentionYesNot publishedYes

Performance

Blaxel19.48 runs/s
Namespace21.79 runs/s
bochka26.69 runs/s

In StarSling's public run of 2026-09-29 at 4 vCPU and 8 GB, bochka did 26.69 Node.js build-and-test runs per second, Namespace 21.79 and Blaxel 19.48. Higher is better: Namespace does about 1.1 times Blaxel's work in the same time, and bochka about 1.4 times Blaxel's and 1.2 times Namespace's. A Namespace Devbox's vCPU count is a ceiling it can boost to, not a guaranteed share.

Node.js build-and-test loop at 4 vCPU / 8 GB, higher is better. Measured with the open hpc-sandbox-benchmarks suite. Blaxel measured on: Sandbox (active time, RAM-only pricing, CPU bundled). Namespace measured on: Linux compute instance (unit-minutes, PAYG/overage $0.0015).

Pricing in five scenarios

Each bill is priced from the providers' public price lists by the open Battleships engine, with the cheapest plan that runs the scenario.

ScenarioBlaxel, a monthNamespace, a monthbochka, a month
One coding agent, workdays
4 vCPU / 8 GB, 50 GB disk, 8 hours a day, 22 days a month, files kept between days
$33 · Pay-as-you-go Tier 1$50 · Devbox (pay as you go)$20 · $20/mo
One agent that never stops
4 vCPU / 8 GB, 50 GB disk, running 24/7 all month
$120 · Pay-as-you-go Tier 1$176 · Devbox (pay as you go) · with limits$26 · $20/mo
50 agents in parallel
50 machines of 4 vCPU / 8 GB at once, 8-hour sessions, 1,100 sessions a month, Docker inside
$1,489 · Pay-as-you-go Tier 1$2,198 · Devbox (pay as you go)$317 · $20/mo × 3 seats
Sandboxes for your users
2 vCPU / 4 GB, 30,000 sessions of 10 minutes a month, up to 300 at once
$396 · Pay-as-you-go Tier 2 · with limits$1,214 · Devbox (pay as you go)$200 · $100/mo × 2 seats
1,000 short jobs at once
2 vCPU / 4 GB, 1,000 at once, 3 minutes each, 200,000 jobs a month
$876 · Pay-as-you-go Tier 2 · with limits$3,237 · Devbox (pay as you go)$2,000 · $2000/mo · with limits

Blaxel: Blaxel charges for allocated RAM per second while a sandbox is active, with CPU included. In standby you pay only snapshot storage, and volumes are billed on their full size.

Namespace: Namespace bills Devboxes in Devbox Minutes at $0.004 each on every plan, one a minute for 4 vCPU / 8 GB. The Team and Business plan minutes cover runners and instances, not Devboxes, and stored files cost $0.20 per GB-month.

Namespace: Your plan payment (from $20 a month) is all usage credit, billed per second while a machine runs. A stopped sandbox costs nothing and keeps its disk.

Limits in those scenarios

Blaxel's self-serve tiers allow 10, 50 or 200 sandboxes at once, standby ones included, so 300 users at once or 1,000 jobs at once need a sales tier. Namespace's limit is time: a Devbox stops after at most 24 hours, so the agent that never stops has to restart at least once a day, and it does not publish a Devbox concurrency limit or an egress price. bochka allows 100 to 2,000 sandboxes at once by plan, but it limits starts per minute, so 1,000 jobs at the same moment get queued.

ScenarioBlaxelNamespacebochka
One coding agent, workdaysNone that bite
  • egress price not published
None that bite
One agent that never stopsNone that bite
  • sessions end after 24 h: needs restarts to run 24/7
  • egress price not published
None that bite
50 agents in parallelNone that bite
  • egress price not published
None that bite
Sandboxes for your users
  • Pay-as-you-go Tier 2: max 200 concurrent
  • egress price not published
None that bite
1,000 short jobs at once
  • Pay-as-you-go Tier 2: max 200 concurrent
  • egress price not published
  • max 2,400 starts/day (needs ~6,667)
  • max 600 starts/hour (needs ~1,000)
  • bursts above 90 starts/min are queued (a burst of 333 takes ~4 min to start)

Which one should you use?

Use Blaxel when

your sandboxes sit idle most of the time and must wake in milliseconds with their memory, or when you need tight per-domain egress rules and US regions.

  • Sleeps in seconds, wakes in milliseconds. Useful if sandboxes sit idle most of the time: Blaxel sleeps seconds after the last connection and wakes in under 25 ms.
  • No clock on an active sandbox. Useful for agents that run past a day: Blaxel does not stop an active sandbox, while a Namespace Devbox stops by 24 hours.
  • Finer network rules. Useful if agents must reach only chosen APIs: Blaxel filters by domain, method and path, and offers static egress IPs.

Use Namespace when

you need macOS or Windows machines, faster GitHub Actions runners with build caches, or Devboxes for people that stop when idle.

  • macOS and Windows. Useful if your agents build iOS or Mac apps or test on Windows: Namespace runs macOS on Apple Silicon and Windows machines.
  • CI runners and build caches. Useful if you also want faster GitHub Actions: Namespace is a drop-in runner with Docker, Bazel and Turborepo caching.
  • Nested virtualization on Linux. Useful for emulators or VMs: Namespace's Linux compute instances expose /dev/kvm, which Blaxel's Firecracker guests do not get.

Where bochka fits

If your agents do real work for hours or days on Linux, look at bochka. Blaxel is shaped for sandboxes that sleep most of the time, and Namespace for CI and Devboxes that stop within a day. bochka gives each agent a full, faster VM that keeps running, with a real disk and the agents built in.

A whole Linux machine with /dev/kvm

Without /dev/kvm an Android emulator or a VM does not start. Blaxel's Firecracker guests never get it, and on Namespace you move to a compute instance, which still stops after 3, 5 or 24 hours by plan.

A real disk with no session clock

Blaxel keeps files in memory, about half the RAM, so a big repo fills it unless you attach a volume at creation. A Namespace Devbox is shut down by 24 hours, even mid-task, and your code must restart it.

Agents you drive from outside

On Blaxel you get a Claude Code image and build the harness yourself. On Namespace a partner such as Cursor or Devin runs the agent loop. bochka ships the agents with a prompt, steer and events API.

Use bochka when your agents work on Linux for hours or days: a full, faster VM with no session cap, Docker and /dev/kvm, a disk that stays, a 60fps desktop, and coding agents you drive from outside. Compare it one to one: bochka vs Blaxel and bochka vs Namespace.

Questions people ask

Is Blaxel cheaper than Namespace?

In the scenarios we priced, yes: one coding agent on workdays is $33 against $50, one agent running all month $120 against $176, and 50 agents in parallel $1,489 against $2,198. On bochka those three come to $20, $26 and $317 a month. For 300 users or 1,000 jobs at once Blaxel's self-serve tiers stop at 200 sandboxes, while Namespace fits.

Which is faster, Blaxel or Namespace?

On the same Node.js build-and-test benchmark at 4 vCPU and 8 GB, Namespace did 21.79 runs per second and Blaxel 19.48. bochka did 26.69 in the same run.

Can Blaxel or Namespace run Docker and Android emulators?

Both run Docker: Blaxel with its Docker-in-sandbox image, Namespace inside Linux Devboxes. An Android emulator needs /dev/kvm, which Blaxel's Firecracker guests do not get and Namespace offers on Linux compute instances only. bochka exposes /dev/kvm on every machine.

How long can a sandbox run on Blaxel or Namespace?

Blaxel does not stop an active sandbox, though its Tier 0 and 1 delete sandboxes after 7 or 30 days. A Namespace Devbox stops after 4, 5 or 24 hours by plan, even while you work, and 24 hours is the most support can raise it to. bochka has no session cap on paid plans.

Do Blaxel or Namespace run macOS?

Namespace does, on Apple M4 Pro and M5 Max machines, and it has Windows on Team plans and up. Blaxel and bochka run Linux only.

Where do Blaxel and Namespace run?

Blaxel runs in Oregon, North Virginia, London and Frankfurt. Namespace runs in several regions and lets you ask support for a preferred one, with region-only residency on Enterprise. bochka runs only in the EU, in Germany, Finland and France.

Try bochka

Install the CLI, then run bochka new.

Product preview

More comparisons

Bochka product preview · Pricing, benchmarks and commands are illustrative. Sandbox provisioning is not connected.