Koyeb vs Modal VM Sandboxes

Koyeb runs each sandbox as a microVM service that can sleep when idle, wake on the next request and run on GPUs. Modal VM Sandboxes give each job a real Linux kernel for Docker and systemd, built for huge bursts of short runs that end within 24 hours.

The companies and products

Koyeb

Koyeb is a serverless cloud for apps, inference and sandboxes, and in February 2026 it agreed to join Mistral AI.

A Koyeb sandbox is a Koyeb service: a microVM started from any Docker image and driven from Python or JavaScript SDKs that run commands, read files and expose a port. It can scale to zero when idle and wake on the next request, and it can run on CPU or GPU instance types. It is built for teams that run AI agents or untrusted code next to apps they already host on Koyeb.

Modal VM Sandboxes

Modal is a serverless cloud for AI work, and VM Sandboxes are the version of its sandboxes that run in a virtual machine with their own Linux kernel.

You create a VM Sandbox from Python, TypeScript or Go code with runtime="vm", run commands in it, and terminate it when the job is done. Modal built the runtime on the Rust-based Cloud Hypervisor, so Docker, FUSE, systemd and nested cgroups work, with the same API, images and prices as its gVisor sandboxes. It became generally available on 1 October 2026 and suits teams that want many short-lived agent machines next to Modal's inference and training.

Which use cases each one fits

For each use case, Battleships prices every sandbox provider on the same workload and sorts them from the cheapest monthly bill up. “4th cheapest of 345” means 3 of the other 344 providers run that workload, with every feature it needs, for less. “With limits” means the provider runs it but misses something, so it is listed after every full match. Open a use case for its whole ranking and what each provider misses.

Use case and its workloadKoyeb: price rankModal VM Sandboxes: price rankbochka: price rank
Software factory
100 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 2,200 sessions of 8 h a month
Koyeb ranks 54th and Modal VM Sandboxes ranks 84th for a software factory, because Koyeb loses local disk on redeploy and Modal ends each VM within 24 hours; bochka ranks 3rd with a disk it keeps.
54th of 367, with limits
$366 a month
84th of 367, with limits
$759 a month
3rd cheapest of 367
$634 a month
Always-on AI employees
50 machines 24/7 · 2 vCPU / 4 GB
An agent that lives on its machine all month rules out Modal VM Sandboxes and their 24-hour cap; Koyeb can stay up but a deep sleep discards the VM, and bochka ranks 5th.
135th of 366, with limits
$923 a month
Can't run it5th cheapest of 366
$657 a month
Code interpreter bursts
100 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 200,000 sessions of 1 min a month
Short code runs suit Koyeb well: Koyeb ranks 4th, with small instances that scale to zero and wake on the next request.
4th cheapest of 345
$66 a month
Can't run it186th of 345, with limits
$2,000 a month
Sandboxes for your users
300 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 30,000 sessions of 23 min a month
Koyeb ranks 6th for sandboxes you hand to your users, thanks to wake on request and many regions; bochka ranks 1st, with a stopped sandbox that keeps its disk for free.
6th cheapest of 361
$495 a month
Can't run itCheapest of 361
$209 a month
RL rollouts
1,000 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 1,000,000 sessions of 3 min a month
Huge bursts of short rollouts are what Modal is built for, with 5,000 containers at once on Team, but both providers only fit as a compromise here.
237th of 360, with limits
$1,631 a month
171st of 360, with limits
$16,322 a month
34th of 360, with limits
$2,000 a month
Agent evals
250 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 15,000 sessions of 20 min a month
19th cheapest of 364
$429 a month
Can't run it10th cheapest of 364
$200 a month
CI runners
40 at once · 8 vCPU / 16 GB · 6,000 sessions of 12 min a month
Both can run builds, but only bochka gives every plan /dev/kvm for Android emulators; Modal offers it on Team and Enterprise on request, and Koyeb does not document it.
142nd of 377, with limits
$88 a month
188th of 377, with limits
$1,064 a month
4th cheapest of 377
$86 a month
24/7 dev boxes
1 machine 24/7 · 4 vCPU / 8 GB
217th of 368, with limits
$37 a month
Can't run it18th cheapest of 368
$26 a month
Computer-use agents
50 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 20,000 sessions of 15 min a month
Neither Koyeb nor Modal VM Sandboxes ships a desktop or browser, so computer-use agents need Xvfb and VNC set up by hand; bochka streams a 60fps desktop with Chromium.
81st of 369, with limits
$123 a month
Can't run it6th cheapest of 369
$200 a month
Browser-use agents
50 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 30,000 sessions of 10 min a month
172nd of 367, with limits
$123 a month
Can't run it7th cheapest of 367
$200 a month
Scraping & bots (startup scale)
50 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 100,000 sessions of 3 min a month
172nd of 346, with limits
$89 a month
Can't run it6th cheapest of 346
$90 a month
Mass scraping & bots (undetectable)
1,000 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 3,000,000 sessions of 2 min a month
65th of 338, with limits
$1,683 a month
Can't run it71st of 338, with limits
$1,800 a month
Parallel red teaming
200 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 5,000 sessions of 30 min a month
233rd of 360, with limits
$299 a month
294th of 360, with limits
$642 a month
2nd cheapest of 360
$200 a month
GPU eval jobs
10 at once · 8 vCPU / 32 GB · 500 sessions of 30 min a month
Koyeb ranks 3rd for GPU eval jobs, with instances up to H100 and H200, while Modal VM Sandboxes have no GPUs (only Modal's gVisor sandboxes do) and bochka has none.
3rd cheapest of 98
$628 a month
Can't run itCan't run it
macOS agents
5 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 1,000 sessions of 20 min a month
Can't run itCan't run itCan't run it

Key features

FeatureKoyebModal VM Sandboxesbochka
IsolationMicroVM per instance, started from any Docker imageVM with its own Linux kernel on Cloud HypervisorFull VM with its own kernel on dedicated AMD Ryzen 9 9950X hosts
CPU benchmark (4 vCPU / 8 GB)Not benchmarked; at least 0.25 dedicated vCPU per GB of memory, bursting to all cores15.54 runs/s26.69 runs/s
Longest sessionNo forced cap; optional auto-delete timer you set, up to 24 hours24 hours (default 5 minutes); continue with a filesystem snapshotNo cap on paid plans; you set the time to live
Disk that survivesLocal disk is lost on redeploy; volumes (preview, 1 to 10 GB, two regions) persistRoot disk is gone when the sandbox ends; only Volumes and snapshots keep filesDisk is kept across stops and saved every minute, with snapshots
Sleep and wakeScales to zero after 5 idle minutes and wakes on the next request; Light Sleep wakes in about 200 msNo paused state; a finished sandbox is goneStop and start by API; a stopped sandbox costs nothing and keeps its disk
Snapshots and forkSDK snapshots of the filesystem, or with running processes, then new sandboxes from them (experimental)Filesystem snapshots boot any number of new sandboxes; memory snapshots in alphaFork a running sandbox with its disk
Nested virtualizationNot documentedTeam and Enterprise plans only, on requestYes, /dev/kvm on every plan
Inbound accessOne exposed HTTPS port at a time, plus an optional TCP proxy to one portEncrypted and raw TCP tunnels, connect tokens, inbound IP allowlistHTTPS URLs for up to 50 ports, token-protected by default, plus raw TCP
Outbound rulesBlock all outbound traffic, or allow only listed IPs and CIDRsBlock all, IP-range allowlist, domain allowlist (beta)Open internet, no provider-side allowlist
Desktop and browserNo desktop or browser in the sandbox SDKNot offered; an example shows how to set up Xvfb and VNC yourself60fps Linux desktop with Chromium and a computer-use API
Coding agentsTutorials that run agents through the command API; an MCP server lets agents manage KoyebExamples onlyClaude Code, Codex and five other agents preinstalled, with a prompt, steer and events API
Keeping API keys out of the sandboxSecrets are environment variables inside the serviceSecrets are environment variables, or you run your own proxy in a sidecarCredentials proxy for model providers and any HTTPS API; switch a credential to another account when credits run out
GPUsRTX 4000 SFF Ada up to H100, H200 and multi-GPUNone on the VM runtime; GPU sandboxes need gVisorNone
RegionsEU, US and Asia: Frankfurt, Paris, Washington D.C., Singapore, Tokyo and moreUS, EU and Asia-Pacific; pinning a region costs 1.15x to 1.75xEU only: Germany, Finland, France
Every feature Battleships tracks (43)
FeatureKoyebModal VM Sandboxesbochka
Full VM (own kernel)YesYesYes
Docker insideYesYesYes
Nested virtualizationNoYesYes
RootNot publishedYesYes
SystemdNot publishedYesYes
Desktop GUINoNoYes
BrowserNoNoYes
Computer-use APINoNoYes
SSHNoYesYes
Persistent diskYesYesYes
Pause/resumeYesNoYes
Automatic snapshotsYesNoYes
Fork/cloneYesYesYes
Live fork (no pause)Not publishedYesYes
Memory forkYesYesNo
Custom image (Docker or snapshot)YesYesYes
≥24 h sessionsYesYesYes
Idle auto-stopYesYesNo
Wake on requestYesNoNo
HTTPS preview URLsYesYesYes
Raw TCP inboundYesYesYes
Public IPv4NoNoNo
Egress allowlistYesYesNo
Secret proxyNoNoYes
Secret proxy for any APINoNoYes
Preinstalled agentsYesNoYes
Agent harness APINoNoYes
MCP serverYesNoNo
GPUYesNoNo
WindowsNoNoNo
Arm64NoNoNo
Self-hostingYesNoNo
BYOCYesNoNo
Open sourceNoNoNo
Scoped API keysNot publishedNot publishedYes
Spend limitsNoNot publishedYes
Usage per sandbox (API)NoNot publishedYes
Audit logsYesYesNo
SSOYesYesNo
SOC 2YesYesNo
HIPAANoYesNo
EU data residencyYesYesYes
Zero data retentionNot publishedNot publishedYes

Performance

KoyebNot measured
Modal VM Sandboxes15.54 runs/s
bochka26.69 runs/s

Koyeb has no comparable measurement: it was not part of the hpc-sandbox-benchmarks run. In that run at 4 vCPU / 8 GB, Modal's VM runtime did 15.54 Node.js build-and-test runs per second and bochka did 26.69, about 1.7 times the CPU work in the same time. This measures CPU speed only, not start time.

Node.js build-and-test loop at 4 vCPU / 8 GB, higher is better. Measured with the open hpc-sandbox-benchmarks suite. Modal VM Sandboxes measured on: VM Sandbox, request = size. Koyeb has no published run in this suite yet, so there is no like-for-like number to compare.

Pricing in five scenarios

Each bill is priced from the providers' public price lists by the open Battleships engine, with the cheapest plan that runs the scenario.

ScenarioKoyeb, a monthModal VM Sandboxes, a monthbochka, a month
One coding agent, workdays
4 vCPU / 8 GB, 50 GB disk, 8 hours a day, 22 days a month, files kept between days
$29 · Pro$15 · Starter · with limits$20 · $20/mo
One agent that never stops
4 vCPU / 8 GB, 50 GB disk, running 24/7 all month
$57 · Pro$178 · Starter · with limits$26 · $20/mo
50 agents in parallel
50 machines of 4 vCPU / 8 GB at once, 8-hour sessions, 1,100 sessions a month, Docker inside
$475 · Pro$2,229 · Starter · with limits$317 · $20/mo × 3 seats
Sandboxes for your users
2 vCPU / 4 GB, 30,000 sessions of 10 minutes a month, up to 300 at once
$329 · Scale$792 · Team$200 · $100/mo × 2 seats
1,000 short jobs at once
2 vCPU / 4 GB, 1,000 at once, 3 minutes each, 200,000 jobs a month
$485 · Scale · with limits$3,193 · Team · with limits$2,000 · $2000/mo · with limits

Koyeb: Koyeb bills each instance per second from the moment it starts, at a fixed price per instance type, and Deep Sleep costs nothing. Pro is $29 a month with $10 of usage included and Scale $299 with $100 included; the rest of the fee is not credit.

Modal VM Sandboxes: Modal bills by the second for whichever is higher, the CPU and memory you request or what you use, until the sandbox ends. Starter is free with $30 of monthly credit and Team is $250 a month with $100 of credit; pinning a region multiplies the price by 1.15x to 1.75x.

Modal VM Sandboxes: Plans start at $20 a month and the whole fee is usage credit. You pay per second while a sandbox runs, and a stopped sandbox costs nothing and keeps its disk.

Limits in those scenarios

Koyeb's priced shape is eco-xlarge, which has a 20 GiB disk with no published price for more, and eco instances guarantee only half of each vCPU, so the 1,000-job burst gets throttled. A Modal VM Sandbox lives at most 24 hours and loses everything outside a Volume or snapshot, so the workday, always-on and fleet scenarios do not fit, and its burst tier runs on shared vCPUs. bochka does not fit the burst either: even the $2,000 plan starts 90 sandboxes a minute, so 1,000 jobs at once queue.

ScenarioKoyebModal VM Sandboxesbochka
One coding agent, workdays
  • disk beyond 20 GiB: price unknown
  • files survive a stop only in Volumes: packages installed elsewhere reset
None that bite
One agent that never stops
  • disk beyond 20 GiB: price unknown
  • Starter: sessions capped at 24 h
  • files survive a stop only in Volumes: packages installed elsewhere reset
None that bite
50 agents in parallelNone that bite
  • files survive a stop only in Volumes: packages installed elsewhere reset
None that bite
Sandboxes for your usersNone that biteNone that biteNone that bite
1,000 short jobs at once
  • burstable CPU: 50% of each vCPU guaranteed, throttled above that
  • shared vCPUs on this tier (Modal (VM Sandboxes) sells dedicated cores separately as “VM Sandbox, request = size”): heavy, sustained CPU use can be slowed by other tenants
  • max 2,400 starts/day (needs ~6,667)
  • max 600 starts/hour (needs ~1,000)
  • bursts above 90 starts/min are queued (a burst of 333 takes ~4 min to start)

Which one should you use?

Use Koyeb when

your sandboxes need GPUs, sleep most of the time and should wake on a request, or must keep running past a day next to apps you already host there.

  • GPUs on the same platform. For agents or evals that need a GPU: Koyeb runs instances from RTX 4000 cards up to H100 and H200.
  • Sleep when idle, wake on request. For sandboxes that sit idle between requests: Koyeb scales to zero and wakes on the next one, in about 200 ms with Light Sleep.
  • No forced 24-hour end. For services that must stay up for days: a Koyeb sandbox runs until you delete it, unless you set an auto-delete timer.

Use Modal VM Sandboxes when

you run huge bursts of short jobs that need a real kernel for Docker or systemd, finish within a day, and sit next to models you already run on Modal.

  • A real kernel for Docker and systemd. For jobs that need Docker, FUSE or systemd inside: each Modal VM Sandbox boots its own Linux kernel.
  • Very large bursts. For huge waves of short jobs: Modal runs 5,000 containers at once on Team, and more on Enterprise.
  • Tighter outbound rules. For agents that must reach only chosen hosts: Modal can allowlist outbound traffic by IP range or by domain.

Where bochka fits

If your agents work for hours or days on a machine they come back to, both Koyeb and Modal VM Sandboxes make you rebuild that machine around volumes or snapshots. bochka gives each agent a full VM that keeps its disk, exposes /dev/kvm and comes with a desktop, coding agents and a key proxy built in.

A disk that stays, with no session cap

On Koyeb the local disk is lost on redeploy and a deep sleep discards the VM, and volumes are a 1 to 10 GB preview. A Modal VM ends within 24 hours and its root disk goes with it, unless you write snapshot code.

/dev/kvm and a faster CPU

Android emulators and nested VMs need /dev/kvm, which Koyeb does not document and Modal gives only on Team or Enterprise on request. bochka measured 26.69 runs/s against Modal's 15.54, so every build waits less.

Desktop, agents and keys handled

Neither ships a desktop or an agent API, so you set up Xvfb, VNC and a harness yourself. Keys sit in environment variables an injected prompt can read, unless you run your own sidecar proxy on Modal.

Use bochka when your agents do real work for hours or days on a machine that keeps its disk: builds, Docker, emulators, a desktop browser and preview servers, with agents and keys handled for you. Compare it one to one: bochka vs Koyeb and bochka vs Modal VM Sandboxes.

Questions people ask

Is Koyeb cheaper than Modal VM Sandboxes?

In most of our scenarios, yes: one always-on agent costs $57 a month on Koyeb against $178 on Modal, and 50 parallel agents $475 against $2,229. For one agent on workdays Modal is cheaper ($15 against $29), but its files reset between days unless you use a Volume. bochka costs $26 and $317 a month for those first two.

Which is faster, Koyeb or Modal VM Sandboxes?

Only Modal was measured: its VM runtime did 15.54 runs per second on the hpc-sandbox-benchmarks CPU test at 4 vCPU / 8 GB. Koyeb was not in that run and promises at least 0.25 dedicated vCPU per GB of memory. bochka did 26.69 runs per second in the same run.

Can Koyeb and Modal VM Sandboxes run Docker?

Koyeb sandboxes start from any Docker image in a microVM. A Modal VM Sandbox has its own Linux kernel, so you can start dockerd inside it, along with FUSE and systemd. bochka runs Docker, systemd and /dev/kvm in every sandbox.

How long can a sandbox run on each?

A Modal VM Sandbox defaults to 5 minutes and stops at 24 hours at most. Koyeb has no forced cap: a sandbox runs until you delete it, unless you set an auto-delete timer. bochka has no session cap on paid plans.

Do Koyeb or Modal VM Sandboxes have GPUs?

Koyeb does, from an RTX 4000 SFF Ada up to H100 and H200, billed per second. Modal VM Sandboxes do not; on Modal only the gVisor sandboxes can use GPUs. bochka is CPU only.

Which one keeps my files?

Neither does by default. Koyeb loses local disk on redeploy and needs a volume, in preview, to keep files, and a Modal VM loses its root disk when it ends unless files sit in a Volume or a snapshot. A bochka sandbox keeps its disk across stops and saves it every minute.

Try bochka

Install the CLI, then run bochka new.

Product preview

More comparisons

Bochka product preview · Pricing, benchmarks and commands are illustrative. Sandbox provisioning is not connected.