E2B vs Daytona

E2B gives every sandbox its own Firecracker microVM that can pause with its memory and wake on the next request. Daytona starts each sandbox as a container by default and sells Linux VMs, Windows and GPUs as extra classes.

The companies and products

E2B

E2B calls itself the AI agent cloud: an API that gives each agent session its own isolated Linux machine.

Every E2B sandbox is a Firecracker microVM that boots from a snapshot, so it starts fast and can be paused and resumed with its memory. You build custom sandboxes from templates based on a Docker image, and drive them from Python or JavaScript SDKs. It is built for teams that run many short code, data or agent jobs, and its runtime is open source.

Daytona

Daytona is a cloud for running AI-generated code: you create sandboxes from code through its API and SDKs.

By default a Daytona sandbox is a Linux container with its own namespaces and reserved vCPU, memory and disk. You can also pick a Linux VM class (pause, fork, memory snapshots, /dev/kvm), a Windows VM class, or a GPU class with Nvidia and AMD cards. It is built for teams that run agent code, code interpreters and evals through Python, TypeScript, Ruby, Go or Java SDKs.

Founded
2023

Which use cases each one fits

For each use case, Battleships prices every sandbox provider on the same workload and sorts them from the cheapest monthly bill up. “16th cheapest of 367” means 15 of the other 366 providers run that workload, with every feature it needs, for less. “With limits” means the provider runs it but misses something, so it is listed after every full match. Open a use case for its whole ranking and what each provider misses.

Use case and its workloadE2B: price rankDaytona: price rankbochka: price rank
Software factory
100 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 2,200 sessions of 8 h a month
16th cheapest of 367
$4,143 a month
15th cheapest of 367
$4,111 a month
3rd cheapest of 367
$634 a month
Always-on AI employees
50 machines 24/7 · 2 vCPU / 4 GB
An assistant that runs all month hits E2B's 24-hour session cap, while Daytona and bochka keep it running.
51st of 366, with limits
$5,348 a month
24th cheapest of 366
$6,104 a month
5th cheapest of 366
$657 a month
Code interpreter bursts
100 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 200,000 sessions of 1 min a month
Both fit short code runs; Daytona comes to $271 a month against $421 on E2B, while bochka's start limits make big bursts a compromise.
37th cheapest of 345
$421 a month
25th cheapest of 345
$271 a month
186th of 345, with limits
$2,000 a month
Sandboxes for your users
300 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 30,000 sessions of 23 min a month
E2B fits 300 sandboxes for your users on Pro+, but 600 vCPU is more than Daytona's Tier 4 pool allows; bochka ranks first.
23rd cheapest of 361
$2,354 a month
154th of 361, with limits
$2,000 a month
Cheapest of 361
$209 a month
RL rollouts
1,000 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 1,000,000 sessions of 3 min a month
E2B ranks 2nd here: its memory forks and high start rate suit many short rollouts, while Daytona's vCPU pool makes this a compromise.
2nd cheapest of 360
$9,384 a month
130th of 360, with limits
$8,261 a month
34th of 360, with limits
$2,000 a month
Agent evals
250 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 15,000 sessions of 20 min a month
78th cheapest of 364
$1,975 a month
189th of 364, with limits
$2,000 a month
10th cheapest of 364
$200 a month
CI runners
40 at once · 8 vCPU / 16 GB · 6,000 sessions of 12 min a month
Both are a compromise for CI: E2B has no nested virtualization and Daytona caps a sandbox at 4 vCPU by default; bochka has 8 vCPU and /dev/kvm from the $20 plan.
337th of 377, with limits
$1,429 a month
308th of 377, with limits
$805 a month
4th cheapest of 377
$86 a month
24/7 dev boxes
1 machine 24/7 · 4 vCPU / 8 GB
A dev box that runs all month needs no session cap and a public address; E2B has the cap, Daytona has no raw TCP or public IP, and bochka has both.
192nd of 368, with limits
$358 a month
183rd of 368, with limits
$245 a month
18th cheapest of 368
$26 a month
Computer-use agents
50 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 20,000 sessions of 15 min a month
All three have a Linux desktop; Daytona adds Windows, and bochka streams its desktop at 60fps for embedding in your app.
32nd cheapest of 369
$1,342 a month
26th cheapest of 369
$1,198 a month
6th cheapest of 369
$200 a month
Browser-use agents
50 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 30,000 sessions of 10 min a month
100th of 367, with limits
$746 a month
93rd of 367, with limits
$598 a month
7th cheapest of 367
$200 a month
Scraping & bots (startup scale)
50 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 100,000 sessions of 3 min a month
57th cheapest of 346
$554 a month
38th cheapest of 346
$404 a month
6th cheapest of 346
$90 a month
Mass scraping & bots (undetectable)
1,000 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 3,000,000 sessions of 2 min a month
227th of 338, with limits
$9,223 a month
202nd of 338, with limits
$8,073 a month
71st of 338, with limits
$1,800 a month
Parallel red teaming
200 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 5,000 sessions of 30 min a month
11th cheapest of 360
$1,043 a month
12th cheapest of 360
$2,000 a month
2nd cheapest of 360
$200 a month
GPU eval jobs
10 at once · 8 vCPU / 32 GB · 500 sessions of 30 min a month
Only Daytona fits: it rents Nvidia and AMD GPUs by the hour, and E2B and bochka are CPU only.
Can't run it20th cheapest of 98
$1,190 a month
Can't run it
macOS agents
5 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 1,000 sessions of 20 min a month
Can't run itCan't run itCan't run it

Key features

FeatureE2BDaytonabochka
IsolationFirecracker microVM with its own kernel for every sandboxContainer by default; Linux VM and Windows VM classes have their own kernelFull VM with its own kernel for every sandbox, on dedicated AMD Ryzen 9 9950X hosts
CPU speed (Node.js build-and-test, 4 vCPU / 8 GB)12.61 runs/s21.52 runs/s on the Linux VM class; the default container class reported no result26.69 runs/s
Biggest machine8 vCPU / 8 GiB self-serve, more on request4 vCPU / 8 GB per sandbox by default, more on request16 vCPU / 32 GB on the $100 plan and above
Session length and stops1 hour on Hobby, 24 hours on Pro; pausing resets the clockNo session cap; the disk is kept and billed while stoppedNo cap on paid plans; disk saved every minute, and a stopped sandbox costs nothing
Pause, resume and fork with memoryEvery sandbox pauses with memory, resumes in about a second, and forks up to 20 copies per callLinux VM and Windows classes pause and fork with memory; containers cannotFork a running sandbox with its disk; resume boots the machine again
Docker and nested virtualizationDocker inside the sandbox; nested virtualization not supportedDocker in all classes; /dev/kvm only on Linux VMs, once KVM is turned on for your organizationDocker, root, systemd and /dev/kvm on every machine
Desktop and computer useLinux desktop for computer useVNC desktop and a computer-use API on Linux and Windows60fps desktop with Chromium, computer use and an embeddable stream
Reaching the sandboxHTTPS URL per port, public unless you turn on a token; no dedicated IPHTTPS preview URLs, token-protected or public; SSH; no raw TCP or public IPHTTPS URLs for up to 50 ports, token-protected by default; raw TCP; dedicated IPv4 or IPv6
Outbound internetOpen internet, with allow and deny lists by IP, CIDR or domainTier 1 and 2 reach only package registries, git hosts and AI APIs; open internet and allowlists from Tier 3Open internet on every plan; no provider-side allowlist
Keeping keys out of the sandboxSecrets injected into outbound HTTPS headers (private beta)Secrets proxy swaps placeholders in HTTPS headers for allowed hostsCredentials proxy for model providers and any HTTPS API; switch a credential to another account when credits run out
Coding agentsTemplates and guides, run through the command APIGuides install agents and run them through process execSeven agents preinstalled, driven from outside with a prompt, steer and events API
GPUsNone, CPU onlyNvidia and AMD GPUs, on demand or preemptibleNone
WindowsNo Windows sandboxesWindows VM sandboxes in three sizesNo Windows guests; Wine for Windows apps
Regions and self-hostingUS by default, EU and APAC on Pro; open-source runtime and bring your own cloud on EnterpriseUS and EU, plus dedicated regions and your own machines; public repository no longer updatedEU only (Germany, Finland, France)
Every feature Battleships tracks (43)
FeatureE2BDaytonabochka
Full VM (own kernel)YesNoYes
Docker insideYesYesYes
Nested virtualizationNoYesYes
RootYesYesYes
SystemdYesNot publishedYes
Desktop GUIYesYesYes
BrowserYesYesYes
Computer-use APIYesYesYes
SSHYesYesYes
Persistent diskYesYesYes
Pause/resumeYesYesYes
Automatic snapshotsYesYesYes
Fork/cloneYesYesYes
Live fork (no pause)YesNoYes
Memory forkYesYesNo
Custom image (Docker or snapshot)YesYesYes
≥24 h sessionsYesYesYes
Idle auto-stopYesYesNo
Wake on requestYesNoNo
HTTPS preview URLsYesYesYes
Raw TCP inboundNoNoYes
Public IPv4NoNoNo
Egress allowlistYesYesNo
Secret proxyYesYesYes
Secret proxy for any APIYesYesYes
Preinstalled agentsYesYesYes
Agent harness APINoNoYes
MCP serverYesYesNo
GPUNoYesNo
WindowsNoYesNo
Arm64NoNoNo
Self-hostingYesNoNo
BYOCYesYesNo
Open sourceYesNoNo
Scoped API keysNot publishedYesYes
Spend limitsYesNot publishedYes
Usage per sandbox (API)NoYesYes
Audit logsNot publishedYesNo
SSONoYesNo
SOC 2YesYesNo
HIPAAYesYesNo
EU data residencyYesYesYes
Zero data retentionNot publishedNot publishedYes

Performance

E2B12.61 runs/s
Daytona21.52 runs/s
bochka26.69 runs/s

In StarSling's public run of 2026-09-29 at 4 vCPU / 8 GB, bochka did 26.69 Node.js build-and-test runs per second, Daytona's Linux VM class did 21.52 and E2B did 12.61. So Daytona's VM class did about 1.7 times the work of E2B, and bochka about twice the work of E2B. Daytona's default container class reported no result, so there is no number for the class most Daytona sandboxes use.

Node.js build-and-test loop at 4 vCPU / 8 GB, higher is better. Measured with the open hpc-sandbox-benchmarks suite. Daytona measured on: Linux VM sandbox (same rates; KVM / nested virt per-org feature).

Pricing in five scenarios

Each bill is priced from the providers' public price lists by the open Battleships engine, with the cheapest plan that runs the scenario.

ScenarioE2B, a monthDaytona, a monthbochka, a month
One coding agent, workdays
4 vCPU / 8 GB, 50 GB disk, 8 hours a day, 22 days a month, files kept between days
$202 · Pro$56 · Tier 3 ($500 top-up)$20 · $20/mo
One agent that never stops
4 vCPU / 8 GB, 50 GB disk, running 24/7 all month
$368 · Pro · with limits$245 · Tier 3 ($500 top-up)$26 · $20/mo
50 agents in parallel
50 machines of 4 vCPU / 8 GB at once, 8-hour sessions, 1,100 sessions a month, Docker inside
$2,773 · Pro$2,682 · Tier 3 ($500 top-up)$317 · $20/mo × 3 seats
Sandboxes for your users
2 vCPU / 4 GB, 30,000 sessions of 10 minutes a month, up to 300 at once
$1,395 · Pro+ (600 concurrent)$2,000 · Tier 4 ($2,000 top-up every 30 days) · with limits$200 · $100/mo × 2 seats
1,000 short jobs at once
2 vCPU / 4 GB, 1,000 at once, 3 minutes each, 200,000 jobs a month
$2,797 · Pro++ (1,100 concurrent)$2,000 · Tier 4 ($2,000 top-up every 30 days) · with limits$2,000 · $2000/mo · with limits

E2B: E2B bills per second for the vCPU and RAM you set, idle time included, until you pause or kill the sandbox. Pro costs $150 a month for higher limits, with no usage credit.

Daytona: Daytona bills per second for the vCPU, memory and disk you reserve from a prepaid wallet, and keeps billing the disk while a sandbox is stopped. Open internet needs a $500 top-up (Tier 3), and the biggest pool needs $2,000 every 30 days (Tier 4).

Daytona: Plans start at $20 a month, and the whole fee is usage credit spent per second while a sandbox runs. A stopped sandbox costs nothing and keeps its disk.

Limits in those scenarios

E2B caps a session at 24 hours on Pro, which is why it does not fit the agent that never stops. Daytona limits the total vCPU running at once, up to 500 vCPU on Tier 4, so 300 sandboxes for your users (600 vCPU) and 1,000 short jobs at once do not fit without a custom limit, while E2B fits both on Pro+ and Pro++. Daytona also reaches only a short list of hosts below Tier 3. bochka fits every scenario except the 1,000-job burst, where its daily start limit falls short.

ScenarioE2BDaytonabochka
One coding agent, workdays
  • disk beyond 20 GiB: price unknown
  • egress price not published
  • egress price not published
  • Tier 1 (email verified), Tier 2 (card + $25 top-up) reach only an allowlist (package registries, git, AI APIs)
None that bite
One agent that never stops
  • Pro: sessions capped at 24 h
  • disk beyond 20 GiB: price unknown
  • egress price not published
  • egress price not published
  • Tier 1 (email verified), Tier 2 (card + $25 top-up) reach only an allowlist (package registries, git, AI APIs)
None that bite
50 agents in parallel
  • egress price not published
  • egress price not published
  • Tier 1 (email verified), Tier 2 (card + $25 top-up) reach only an allowlist (package registries, git, AI APIs)
None that bite
Sandboxes for your users
  • egress price not published
  • max 500 vCPU running at once (needs 600)
  • max 1,000 GiB running at once (needs 1,200)
  • egress price not published
  • Tier 1 (email verified), Tier 2 (card + $25 top-up) reach only an allowlist (package registries, git, AI APIs)
None that bite
1,000 short jobs at once
  • egress price not published
  • bursts above 300 starts/min are queued (a burst of 333 takes ~2 min to start)
  • max 500 vCPU running at once (needs 2,000)
  • max 1,000 GiB running at once (needs 4,000)
  • egress price not published
  • Tier 1 (email verified), Tier 2 (card + $25 top-up) reach only an allowlist (package registries, git, AI APIs)
  • max 2,400 starts/day (needs ~6,667)
  • max 600 starts/hour (needs ~1,000)
  • bursts above 90 starts/min are queued (a burst of 333 takes ~4 min to start)

Which one should you use?

Use E2B when

you run many short jobs that pause between requests and wake fast, or need the US or APAC, or an open runtime you can host yourself.

  • Memory pause and wake on request. For jobs that sleep between requests: any E2B sandbox pauses with its memory and comes back in about a second.
  • A microVM for every sandbox. For untrusted code: every E2B sandbox has its own kernel, while Daytona's default class is a container.
  • Open runtime and more regions. For teams that want control: the runtime is Apache-2.0, and it runs in the US, EU and APAC.

Use Daytona when

your agents need GPUs, Windows desktops, sandboxes that run for days, or your own machines.

  • Faster CPU in the same test. For build-heavy agents: Daytona's Linux VM class did 21.52 runs per second, about 1.7 times as fast as E2B.
  • GPUs and Windows. For model evals or Windows desktops: Daytona rents Nvidia and AMD GPUs and runs Windows VM sandboxes.
  • No session cap. For agents that run for days: a Daytona sandbox has no 24-hour limit, so you do not have to pause and resume it.

Where bochka fits

If your agents do long, real work like installs, builds, tests, Docker and emulators, look at bochka. Every sandbox is a full VM with /dev/kvm, it ran the CPU test faster than both, and it has no session cap. Pick E2B or Daytona instead if you need memory pause, GPUs, Windows or a US region.

A full VM with /dev/kvm every time

E2B has no nested virtualization, so Android emulators and VMs cannot start. Daytona's default is a container sharing the host kernel; you get /dev/kvm only by picking the Linux VM class and having KVM turned on.

Faster builds that never get cut off

bochka did 26.69 runs per second, against 21.52 for Daytona's VM class and 12.61 for E2B, so agents wait less. E2B also stops a session at 24 hours on Pro, so your code has to pause and resume it.

Agents and keys handled from outside

On both you install the agent yourself and run it as a process, and keep secrets only in request headers. bochka drives seven preinstalled agents from outside and proxies any HTTPS API, switching accounts when credits run out.

Use bochka when your agents do real work for hours: installs, builds, tests, Docker and emulators on a fast full VM with a desktop, hosting and coding agents built in. Compare it one to one: bochka vs E2B and bochka vs Daytona.

Questions people ask

Is E2B cheaper than Daytona?

In most of our scenarios Daytona costs less: one coding agent on workdays comes to $56 on Daytona against $202 on E2B, and 50 agents in parallel to $2,682 against $2,773. For 300 sandboxes for your users, E2B fits at $1,395 while Daytona's Tier 4 pool is too small. bochka comes to $20, $317 and $200 a month in those three.

Which is faster, E2B or Daytona?

On the StarSling CPU test at 4 vCPU / 8 GB, Daytona's Linux VM class did 21.52 runs per second and E2B did 12.61. Daytona's default containers reported no result. bochka did 26.69 in the same run.

Are E2B and Daytona sandboxes VMs or containers?

Every E2B sandbox is a Firecracker microVM with its own kernel. A Daytona sandbox is a container by default, with Linux VM and Windows VM classes on top. Every bochka sandbox is a full VM.

Can E2B or Daytona run Docker and Android emulators?

Both run Docker. E2B does not support nested virtualization, so emulators cannot start; Daytona gives /dev/kvm only on its Linux VM class, once KVM is turned on for your organization. bochka has /dev/kvm on every machine.

Can a sandbox run for days on E2B or Daytona?

On E2B a session stops after 24 hours on Pro and 1 hour on Hobby, though pausing resets the clock. Daytona has no session cap, so one agent all month fits at $245. bochka has no cap on paid plans and came to $26 a month.

Try bochka

Install the CLI, then run bochka new.

Product preview

More comparisons

Bochka product preview · Pricing, benchmarks and commands are illustrative. Sandbox provisioning is not connected.