bochka vs Jarvislabs
Jarvislabs is a GPU cloud: you rent Nvidia GPUs, GPU containers and plain CPU virtual machines by the minute, mostly in India. bochka is built for agents, with coding agents, a 60fps desktop, minute-by-minute snapshots and free stops on every VM in the EU.
Where bochka stands out
Free stops, snapshots every minute, live fork
A stopped bochka sandbox costs nothing, and its disk is snapshotted every minute and on stop. You can fork a sandbox while it runs, so one set-up machine becomes many. Jarvislabs has no snapshot, clone or fork command: a paused instance keeps its disk and keeps paying for it.
Coding agents and a desktop built in
bochka ships Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode and other agents inside each sandbox, and you drive them from outside with a prompt, steer and events API. Every sandbox also has a 60fps desktop with Chromium and computer use. A Jarvislabs CPU VM is a clean Linux machine: you install the agent, a browser and any desktop yourself.
HTTPS ports and keys out of the sandbox
Each bochka sandbox can serve HTTPS on up to 50 ports behind a token, with no certificates to set up. bochka's credentials proxy keeps real AI keys out of the sandbox and works with any HTTPS API you register. A Jarvislabs VM gets a public IP with every port open until you add a security group, and your keys live on the machine as environment variables.
The companies and products
bochka
bochka.xyz runs sandboxes for AI agents: each one is a full Linux VM with its own kernel.
You start a machine with one command or one API call, then SSH in, run Docker, open a desktop, or let a built-in agent (Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode and others) work in it. The disk stays between sessions, and a stopped sandbox costs nothing.
- Isolation
- Full VM per sandbox, own kernel
- Regions
- EU: Germany, Finland, France
Jarvislabs
Jarvislabs is an AI cloud from India that rents Nvidia GPUs by the minute for training and serving models.
You can rent a GPU VM with root and your own kernel, a Template (a GPU container with PyTorch, ComfyUI or similar ready, opened in JupyterLab, VS Code or SSH), a plain CPU VM, or a multi-node GPU cluster. It also serves open models through Managed Endpoints, Serverless workers and a token-priced Model API. It is built for people who train, fine-tune and serve AI models, not as a sandbox for agents, though its jl CLI is written so a coding agent on your laptop can drive the GPUs.
Which use cases each one fits
For each use case, Battleships prices every sandbox provider on the same workload and sorts them from the cheapest monthly bill up. “3rd cheapest of 367” means 2 of the other 366 providers run that workload, with every feature it needs, for less. “With limits” means the provider runs it but misses something, so it is listed after every full match. Open a use case for its whole ranking and what each provider misses.
| Use case and its workload | bochka: price rank | Jarvislabs: price rank |
|---|---|---|
| Software factory 100 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 2,200 sessions of 8 h a month A Jarvislabs CPU VM gives a coding agent root and Docker, but you install the agent and tooling yourself, and there are no snapshots or forks to branch work. | 3rd cheapest of 367 $634 a month | 154th of 367, with limits $1,406 a month |
| Always-on AI employees 50 machines 24/7 · 2 vCPU / 4 GB An always-on assistant fits on a Jarvislabs CPU VM, but the browser, the desktop and the agent are yours to install; bochka ships them ready. | 5th cheapest of 366 $657 a month | 185th of 366, with limits $1,670 a month |
| Code interpreter bursts 100 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 200,000 sessions of 1 min a month Jarvislabs bills small CPU VMs by the minute with no plan fee, which suits short bursts better than bochka's start limits, though each VM takes about 90 seconds to boot. | 186th of 345, with limits $2,000 a month | 103rd of 345, with limits $169 a month |
| Sandboxes for your users 300 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 30,000 sessions of 23 min a month Jarvislabs does not publish how many instances an account can run at once, so 300 sandboxes for your users means asking first. | Cheapest of 361 $209 a month | 215th of 361, with limits $539 a month |
| RL rollouts 1,000 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 1,000,000 sessions of 3 min a month | 34th of 360, with limits $2,000 a month | 43rd of 360, with limits $2,568 a month |
| Agent evals 250 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 15,000 sessions of 20 min a month | 10th cheapest of 364 $200 a month | 113th of 364, with limits $411 a month |
| CI runners 40 at once · 8 vCPU / 16 GB · 6,000 sessions of 12 min a month Both fit: a Jarvislabs CPU VM makes a plain CI runner, and bochka adds per-second billing and stops that cost nothing between jobs. | 4th cheapest of 377 $86 a month | 20th cheapest of 377 $253 a month |
| 24/7 dev boxes 1 machine 24/7 · 4 vCPU / 8 GB | 18th cheapest of 368 $26 a month | 52nd cheapest of 368 $68 a month |
| Computer-use agents 50 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 20,000 sessions of 15 min a month Jarvislabs has no desktop or computer-use API, only JupyterLab, VS Code in the browser and SSH, while bochka streams a 60fps desktop with computer use. | 6th cheapest of 369 $200 a month | 154th of 369, with limits $377 a month |
| Browser-use agents 50 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 30,000 sessions of 10 min a month | 7th cheapest of 367 $200 a month | 204th of 367, with limits $205 a month |
| Scraping & bots (startup scale) 50 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 100,000 sessions of 3 min a month | 6th cheapest of 346 $90 a month | 244th of 346, with limits $247 a month |
| Mass scraping & bots (undetectable) 1,000 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 3,000,000 sessions of 2 min a month | 71st of 338, with limits $1,800 a month | 158th of 338, with limits $4,942 a month |
| Parallel red teaming 200 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 5,000 sessions of 30 min a month | 2nd cheapest of 360 $200 a month | 156th of 360, with limits $127 a month |
| GPU eval jobs 10 at once · 8 vCPU / 32 GB · 500 sessions of 30 min a month Only Jarvislabs fits: it rents Nvidia GPUs from L4 to H200 by the minute, and bochka has no GPUs. | Can't run it | 9th cheapest of 98 $876 a month |
| macOS agents 5 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 1,000 sessions of 20 min a month | Can't run it | Can't run it |
Key features
Every feature Battleships tracks (43)
| Feature | bochka | Jarvislabs |
|---|---|---|
| Full VM (own kernel) | Yes | Yes |
| Docker inside | Yes | Yes |
| Nested virtualization | Yes | Not published |
| Root | Yes | Yes |
| Systemd | Yes | Not published |
| Desktop GUI | Yes | No |
| Browser | Yes | No |
| Computer-use API | Yes | No |
| SSH | Yes | Yes |
| Persistent disk | Yes | Yes |
| Pause/resume | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic snapshots | Yes | No |
| Fork/clone | Yes | No |
| Live fork (no pause) | Yes | No |
| Memory fork | No | No |
| Custom image (Docker or snapshot) | Yes | Yes |
| ≥24 h sessions | Yes | Yes |
| Idle auto-stop | No | Yes |
| Wake on request | No | Yes |
| HTTPS preview URLs | Yes | Yes |
| Raw TCP inbound | Yes | Yes |
| Public IPv4 | No | Yes |
| Egress allowlist | No | Yes |
| Secret proxy | Yes | No |
| Secret proxy for any API | Yes | No |
| Preinstalled agents | Yes | No |
| Agent harness API | Yes | No |
| MCP server | No | No |
| GPU | No | Yes |
| Windows | No | No |
| Arm64 | No | No |
| Self-hosting | No | No |
| BYOC | No | No |
| Open source | No | No |
| Scoped API keys | Yes | Not published |
| Spend limits | Yes | Yes |
| Usage per sandbox (API) | Yes | Yes |
| Audit logs | No | Not published |
| SSO | No | No |
| SOC 2 | No | No |
| HIPAA | No | No |
| EU data residency | Yes | No |
| Zero data retention | Yes | Not published |
Performance
There is no comparable measurement: Jarvislabs was not part of the public StarSling benchmark run. bochka did 26.69 Node.js build-and-test runs per second at 4 vCPU / 8 GB in that run, on dedicated AMD Ryzen 9 9950X (Zen 5) hosts. Jarvislabs publishes GPU benchmarks for its H200 VMs, but no CPU benchmark for its CPU VMs.
Node.js build-and-test loop at 4 vCPU / 8 GB, higher is better. Measured with the open hpc-sandbox-benchmarks suite. Jarvislabs has no published run in this suite yet, so there is no like-for-like number to compare.
Pricing in five scenarios
Each bill is priced from the providers' public price lists by the open Battleships engine, with the cheapest plan that runs the scenario.
| Scenario | bochka, a month | Jarvislabs, a month |
|---|---|---|
| One coding agent, workdays 4 vCPU / 8 GB, 50 GB disk, 8 hours a day, 22 days a month, files kept between days | $20 · $20/mo | $21 · On-demand |
| One agent that never stops 4 vCPU / 8 GB, 50 GB disk, running 24/7 all month | $26 · $20/mo | $71 · On-demand |
| 50 agents in parallel 50 machines of 4 vCPU / 8 GB at once, 8-hour sessions, 1,100 sessions a month, Docker inside | $317 · $20/mo × 3 seats | $892 · On-demand |
| Sandboxes for your users 2 vCPU / 4 GB, 30,000 sessions of 10 minutes a month, up to 300 at once | $200 · $100/mo × 2 seats | $231 · On-demand · with limits |
| 1,000 short jobs at once 2 vCPU / 4 GB, 1,000 at once, 3 minutes each, 200,000 jobs a month | $2,000 · $2000/mo · with limits | $514 · On-demand · with limits |
bochka: You pick a monthly plan from $20, and all of it becomes usage credit spent per second on running sandboxes. A stopped sandbox costs nothing and keeps its disk.
Jarvislabs: Jarvislabs bills per minute from a prepaid wallet with no plan fee. CPU VMs cost $0.012 per vCPU-hour plus $0.0032 per GB of RAM, with 4 GB of RAM per vCPU, and the disk is extra at $0.10/GB-month, billed while running and while paused, with at least 100 GB on a VM.
Limits in those scenarios
Jarvislabs does not publish how many instances an account can run at once, so 300 sandboxes for your users or 1,000 short jobs at once are not confirmed until you ask. A paused VM, including a CPU VM, keeps its whole disk; only GPU containers (Templates) lose everything outside /home. Its smallest CPU VM is 2 vCPU / 8 GB, and each VM takes about 90 seconds to boot. On bochka the limit is a sandbox count by plan plus starts per minute, so the 1,000-job burst is queued and needs more starts per day than the $2,000 plan allows.
| Scenario | bochka | Jarvislabs |
|---|---|---|
| One coding agent, workdays | None that bite | None that bite |
| One agent that never stops | None that bite | None that bite |
| 50 agents in parallel | None that bite |
|
| Sandboxes for your users | None that bite |
|
| 1,000 short jobs at once |
|
|
Which one should you use?
Use Jarvislabs when
your work needs Nvidia GPUs, model serving that scales to zero, or machines in India.
- Nvidia GPUs by the minute. Useful if your work trains, fine-tunes or serves models: Jarvislabs rents Nvidia GPUs from L4 to H200 by the minute.
- Model serving that scales to zero. Useful for inference: Jarvislabs serves open models on GPU workers that stop when idle and start on the next request.
- Network rules and India regions. Useful for teams in India, or who need firewall rules set by the provider: Jarvislabs has security groups, VPCs and reserved IPs.
Use bochka when
you run agents: VMs that come with coding agents, a desktop, HTTPS ports and a credentials proxy, that snapshot every minute, fork while running and cost nothing while stopped.
- Free stops, snapshots every minute, live fork. Agents sit idle between tasks and often need to branch work. On Jarvislabs every paused VM still bills at least 100 GB of disk, and copying a set-up machine means building it again by hand.
- Coding agents and a desktop built in. Without these, you write and maintain the setup scripts, the agent runner and the desktop stream for every machine. Jarvislabs' CLI lets an agent on your laptop manage machines, not work inside one.
- HTTPS ports and keys out of the sandbox. An agent that holds a real API key can leak it in a log or a commit. On Jarvislabs the key has to sit on the machine, and every preview server needs its own TLS and firewall rules.
Questions people ask
Is bochka cheaper than Jarvislabs?
It depends on the scenario. One coding agent on workdays comes to $20 a month on bochka and $21 on Jarvislabs, one agent running all month is $26 versus $71, and 50 agents in parallel are $317 versus $892. For 1,000 short jobs at once Jarvislabs comes to $514 and bochka to $2,000, though neither fits without higher limits.
Does bochka have GPUs like Jarvislabs?
No. bochka runs Linux VMs on dedicated AMD Ryzen 9 9950X hosts and has no GPUs. If your agents need to train or serve models, rent the GPUs on Jarvislabs.
Does a paused Jarvislabs instance cost money?
Yes, for storage. Pausing stops compute billing, but the disk keeps billing at $0.00014 per GB-hour, and VMs need at least 100 GB. A stopped bochka sandbox costs nothing and keeps its disk.
What happens when a Jarvislabs balance runs out?
Jarvislabs' FAQ says instances pause automatically when the balance reaches zero, and if the balance goes negative all data is permanently deleted and cannot be recovered. Keep enough credit in the wallet to cover storage for paused machines.
Where does my data run?
bochka runs only in the EU (Germany, Finland and France), with EU data residency and a zero data retention option. Jarvislabs creates new instances only in its India regions; its old EU1 region no longer accepts new instances.
Is bochka SOC 2 compliant?
SOC 2 is in progress. We're open about where we stand: live status at status.bochka.xyz and our data retention policy at docs.bochka.xyz/data-retention.
Start a sandbox
Install the CLI, then run bochka new.
Product preview
More comparisons
- bochka vs Verda
- bochka vs Nebius
- bochka vs Cerebrium
- bochka vs Runpod
- bochka vs Crusoe
- bochka vs Paperspace
- bochka vs Replicate
- bochka vs SF Compute
- bochka vs E2B
- bochka vs Daytona
- bochka vs Modal
- bochka vs Vercel Sandbox
- Runpod vs Jarvislabs
- Nebius vs Jarvislabs
- Crusoe vs Jarvislabs
- Paperspace vs Jarvislabs
- Jarvislabs vs Hyperstack
- Jarvislabs vs Verda
- Jarvislabs vs Cerebrium
- Jarvislabs vs Baseten