Blaxel vs Agent 37

Blaxel gives every sandbox its own kernel in a Firecracker microVM that sleeps in seconds and wakes in under 25 ms. Agent 37 starts with lighter gVisor sandboxes, one per user, that cost much less per hour, and sells a full VM type when you need Docker or KVM.

The companies and products

Blaxel

Blaxel is a San Francisco company that runs cloud infrastructure for AI agents, and since September 2026 it is part of Baseten.

You get sandboxes, batch jobs, MCP server hosting and a model gateway. Each sandbox is a Firecracker microVM with its own kernel that drops to standby when nothing is connected and resumes in under 25 ms with its memory and running processes. It is built for agent products that start many sandboxes and want them asleep most of the time.

Agent 37

Agent 37 hosts AI agents, one isolated, always-on sandbox per user, behind one API.

You create an instance from a template (Hermes, OpenClaw, Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Pi, Grok or your own Docker image) and talk to it through a chat API, files, exec, SSH and HTTPS URLs. The default instance is a container enforced by gVisor; a VM type gives a full Linux machine with its own kernel for Docker, Kubernetes and Android emulators. It is built for companies that give each of their customers an agent.

Which use cases each one fits

For each use case, Battleships prices every sandbox provider on the same workload and sorts them from the cheapest monthly bill up. “10th cheapest of 367” means 9 of the other 366 providers run that workload, with every feature it needs, for less. “With limits” means the provider runs it but misses something, so it is listed after every full match. Open a use case for its whole ranking and what each provider misses.

Use case and its workloadBlaxel: price rankAgent 37: price rankbochka: price rank
Software factory
100 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 2,200 sessions of 8 h a month
bochka gives Docker, systemd and /dev/kvm in every sandbox; Blaxel runs Docker but has no /dev/kvm and keeps files in memory, and Agent 37 needs its VM type at 2.5 times the compute rate.
10th cheapest of 367
$2,373 a month
2nd cheapest of 367
$551 a month
3rd cheapest of 367
$634 a month
Always-on AI employees
50 machines 24/7 · 2 vCPU / 4 GB
Both suit mostly idle assistants that sleep and keep their memory: Agent 37 is built for one per user, Blaxel wakes faster, and bochka keeps them on a full VM with a disk that stays.
12th cheapest of 366
$2,832 a month
Cheapest of 366
$279 a month
5th cheapest of 366
$657 a month
Code interpreter bursts
100 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 200,000 sessions of 1 min a month
Blaxel's millisecond wake and Agent 37's small default sandboxes both suit short code runs, while bochka's start limits make large bursts a poor fit.
14th cheapest of 345
$144 a month
Cheapest of 345
$22 a month
186th of 345, with limits
$2,000 a month
Sandboxes for your users
300 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 30,000 sessions of 23 min a month
Blaxel and Agent 37 both stop at 200 sandboxes at once on self-serve tiers, counting sleeping ones, while bochka fits 300 users at once on a self-serve plan.
101st of 361, with limits
$926 a month
30th of 361, with limits
$79 a month
Cheapest of 361
$209 a month
RL rollouts
1,000 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 1,000,000 sessions of 3 min a month
77th of 360, with limits
$4,378 a month
6th of 360, with limits
$363 a month
34th of 360, with limits
$2,000 a month
Agent evals
250 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 15,000 sessions of 20 min a month
bochka starts a fresh VM per task from a named snapshot, while the self-serve tiers of both Blaxel and Agent 37 cap how many run at once at 200.
136th of 364, with limits
$704 a month
90th of 364, with limits
$58 a month
10th cheapest of 364
$200 a month
CI runners
40 at once · 8 vCPU / 16 GB · 6,000 sessions of 12 min a month
57th cheapest of 377
$431 a month
2nd cheapest of 377
$84 a month
4th cheapest of 377
$86 a month
24/7 dev boxes
1 machine 24/7 · 4 vCPU / 8 GB
Agent 37 keeps a disk around the clock at a low idle cost with SSH through a tunnel, Blaxel has no native SSH, and bochka is a plain machine with SSH and systemd.
265th of 368, with limits
$114 a month
3rd cheapest of 368
$12 a month
18th cheapest of 368
$26 a month
Computer-use agents
50 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 20,000 sessions of 15 min a month
Blaxel and bochka both run a desktop and a browser, bochka streams a 60fps desktop you can embed, and Agent 37 adds a noVNC desktop through a template build.
14th cheapest of 369
$634 a month
Cheapest of 369
$53 a month
6th cheapest of 369
$200 a month
Browser-use agents
50 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 30,000 sessions of 10 min a month
16th cheapest of 367
$317 a month
48th of 367, with limits
$29 a month
7th cheapest of 367
$200 a month
Scraping & bots (startup scale)
50 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 100,000 sessions of 3 min a month
16th cheapest of 346
$215 a month
Cheapest of 346
$32 a month
6th cheapest of 346
$90 a month
Mass scraping & bots (undetectable)
1,000 at once · 1 vCPU / 2 GB · 3,000,000 sessions of 2 min a month
147th of 338, with limits
$4,292 a month
36th of 338, with limits
$648 a month
71st of 338, with limits
$1,800 a month
Parallel red teaming
200 at once · 2 vCPU / 4 GB · 5,000 sessions of 30 min a month
All three fit: Blaxel adds domain-level egress rules, bochka can fork an attempt that is already running, and Agent 37 has no fork.
3rd cheapest of 360
$217 a month
Cheapest of 360
$43 a month
2nd cheapest of 360
$200 a month
GPU eval jobs
10 at once · 8 vCPU / 32 GB · 500 sessions of 30 min a month
Can't run itCan't run itCan't run it
macOS agents
5 at once · 4 vCPU / 8 GB · 1,000 sessions of 20 min a month
Can't run itCan't run itCan't run it

Key features

FeatureBlaxelAgent 37bochka
IsolationFirecracker microVM with its own kernelgVisor by default; full VM with its own kernel as an opt-in typeFull VM with its own kernel, on dedicated AMD Ryzen 9 9950X hosts
Docker insideYes, with a Docker-in-sandbox imageOnly on the VM type, at 2.5x the default compute rateYes, in every sandbox
Nested virtualizationNo: Firecracker guests do not get /dev/kvm/dev/kvm on the VM type, with a ready Android template/dev/kvm in every sandbox, so Android emulators and VMs run inside
SSH and systemdRoot, terminal through bl connect, no native SSHRoot SSH through a WebSocket tunnel; your entrypoint is PID 1 with no init systemReal SSH, root and systemd
DiskFiles live in memory (about half the RAM); one block volume can be attached at creationDisk that stays, capped by shape (at most 20 GB on 4 vCPU / 8 GB)A real disk that stays, snapshotted every minute and on stop
Sleep and wakeStandby a few seconds after the last connection, wakes in under 25 ms with memory and processesOpt-in auto-sleep after a quiet period (default 15 minutes), memory checkpointed, wakes in a few secondsNo idle timer; stop keeps the disk and costs nothing, resume reboots the VM
ForkFork with memory and running processes (private preview)No fork; daily backups plus one on-demand backup, restored in place onlyFork a running sandbox (disk); named snapshots as shareable templates
Custom imagesCustom images built from Docker imagesYour own linux/amd64 Docker image as a templateTemplates from named snapshots, no Dockerfile builds
CPUCPU bundled with RAM (8 GB comes with 4 cores); 19.48 runs/s measuredShared by default; Performance type on dedicated cores at 4x the compute rate; no published scoreShared vCPUs on dedicated AMD Ryzen 9 9950X hosts; 26.69 runs/s measured
Built-in agentsClaude Code image you drive from its terminal or your own harnessHermes, OpenClaw, Claude Code, Codex, Grok, OpenCode, Pi, with a chat API per instanceClaude Code, Codex, OpenCode, pi and more, with a prompt, steer and events API
Keys kept out of the sandboxProxy fills secrets into outbound HTTPS requests (public preview)Managed LLM, search and Composio through a per-instance token; your own keys go in as env varsProxy for model providers and any HTTPS API you register; switch a credential to another account when one runs out of credits
Inbound trafficPreview URL per port, public or token-protected; no raw TCP or public IPHTTPS URL per port, signed URLs, custom domains; no public IPHTTPS URLs for up to 50 ports, token-protected by default; raw TCP; own IPv6 or IPv4
Outbound rulesDomain allow and deny lists, method and path rules, static egress IPsOpen internet, no provider-side allow listOpen internet; filter inside the VM with nftables
RegionsUS (Oregon, North Virginia), London, FrankfurtUnited StatesEU only (Germany, Finland, France), EU data residency
Every feature Battleships tracks (43)
FeatureBlaxelAgent 37bochka
Full VM (own kernel)YesNoYes
Docker insideYesNoYes
Nested virtualizationNoNoYes
RootYesYesYes
SystemdNoNot publishedYes
Desktop GUIYesYesYes
BrowserYesYesYes
Computer-use APIYesYesYes
SSHNoYesYes
Persistent diskYesYesYes
Pause/resumeYesYesYes
Automatic snapshotsYesYesYes
Fork/cloneYesYesYes
Live fork (no pause)YesYesYes
Memory forkYesNoNo
Custom image (Docker or snapshot)YesYesYes
≥24 h sessionsYesYesYes
Idle auto-stopYesYesNo
Wake on requestYesYesNo
HTTPS preview URLsYesYesYes
Raw TCP inboundNoNot publishedYes
Public IPv4NoNoNo
Egress allowlistYesNoNo
Secret proxyYesYesYes
Secret proxy for any APIYesNoYes
Preinstalled agentsYesYesYes
Agent harness APINoYesYes
MCP serverYesNoNo
GPUNoNoNo
WindowsNoNoNo
Arm64NoNoNo
Self-hostingNoNoNo
BYOCYesNoNo
Open sourceNoNoNo
Scoped API keysYesNot publishedYes
Spend limitsNoYesYes
Usage per sandbox (API)YesYesYes
Audit logsNot publishedNot publishedNo
SSOYesNoNo
SOC 2YesYesNo
HIPAAYesNoNo
EU data residencyYesNoYes
Zero data retentionYesNot publishedYes

Performance

Blaxel19.48 runs/s
Agent 37Not measured
bochka26.69 runs/s

On the hpc-sandbox-benchmarks Node.js build-and-test loop at 4 vCPU and 8 GB, run on September 29, 2026, bochka did 26.69 runs per second and Blaxel 19.48. Higher is better. Agent 37 has no result on that benchmark, so there is no comparable measurement; it says its default instances share host resources and sells a Performance type on dedicated cores.

Node.js build-and-test loop at 4 vCPU / 8 GB, higher is better. Measured with the open hpc-sandbox-benchmarks suite. Blaxel measured on: Sandbox (active time, RAM-only pricing, CPU bundled). Agent 37 has no published run in this suite yet, so there is no like-for-like number to compare.

Pricing in five scenarios

Each bill is priced from the providers' public price lists by the open Battleships engine, with the cheapest plan that runs the scenario.

ScenarioBlaxel, a monthAgent 37, a monthbochka, a month
One coding agent, workdays
4 vCPU / 8 GB, 50 GB disk, 8 hours a day, 22 days a month, files kept between days
$33 · Pay-as-you-go Tier 1$6 · Wallet (any top-up)$20 · $20/mo
One agent that never stops
4 vCPU / 8 GB, 50 GB disk, running 24/7 all month
$120 · Pay-as-you-go Tier 1$12 · Wallet (any top-up)$26 · $20/mo
50 agents in parallel
50 machines of 4 vCPU / 8 GB at once, 8-hour sessions, 1,100 sessions a month, Docker inside
$1,489 · Pay-as-you-go Tier 1$329 · Wallet ($100 lifetime top-ups)$317 · $20/mo × 3 seats
Sandboxes for your users
2 vCPU / 4 GB, 30,000 sessions of 10 minutes a month, up to 300 at once
$396 · Pay-as-you-go Tier 2 · with limits$33 · Wallet ($250 lifetime top-ups) · with limits$200 · $100/mo × 2 seats
1,000 short jobs at once
2 vCPU / 4 GB, 1,000 at once, 3 minutes each, 200,000 jobs a month
$876 · Pay-as-you-go Tier 2 · with limits$73 · Wallet ($250 lifetime top-ups) · with limits$2,000 · $2000/mo · with limits

Blaxel: Blaxel charges for allocated RAM per second while a sandbox is active, meaning a connection is open, with CPU included. In standby you pay only snapshot storage, and volumes are billed on their full size.

Agent 37: Agent 37 uses a prepaid wallet with no plan fee, metered per minute: $0.80 per vCPU and $0.70 per GB of RAM per month while running, and $0.09 per GB of disk per month even while asleep. Performance compute costs 4x and VM compute 2.5x.

Agent 37: A monthly plan from $20, all of it usage credit, billed per second while a machine runs. A stopped sandbox costs nothing and keeps its disk.

Limits in those scenarios

Blaxel's self-serve tiers allow 10, 50 or 200 sandboxes at once, and Agent 37's allow 1, 10, 50 or 200; both count sleeping sandboxes, so neither fits 300 users or 1,000 jobs at once without talking to them. Blaxel's lower tiers delete sandboxes after 7 or 30 days, and Agent 37 caps disk per shape (20 GB on 4 vCPU / 8 GB). The 50-agent scenario needs Docker, so it is priced on Agent 37's VM type. bochka's plans allow up to 2,000 at once, but it caps how many machines start per minute, so 1,000 jobs at the same moment get queued.

ScenarioBlaxelAgent 37bochka
One coding agent, workdaysNone that bite
  • egress price not published
None that bite
One agent that never stopsNone that bite
  • egress price not published
None that bite
50 agents in parallelNone that bite
  • egress price not published
None that bite
Sandboxes for your users
  • Pay-as-you-go Tier 2: max 200 concurrent
  • max 200 concurrent
  • egress price not published
None that bite
1,000 short jobs at once
  • Pay-as-you-go Tier 2: max 200 concurrent
  • max 200 concurrent
  • shared vCPUs on this tier: heavy, sustained CPU use can be slowed by other tenants
  • egress price not published
  • max 2,400 starts/day (needs ~6,667)
  • max 600 starts/hour (needs ~1,000)
  • bursts above 90 starts/min are queued (a burst of 333 takes ~4 min to start)

Which one should you use?

Use Blaxel when

your sandboxes sit idle most of the time and must wake in milliseconds with their memory, need provider-side network rules, or must run in Europe and the US.

  • Wakes in milliseconds. For sandboxes that sit idle most of the time: Blaxel sleeps seconds after the last connection and wakes in under 25 ms.
  • Own kernel and Docker by default. Every Blaxel sandbox is a microVM with its own kernel and can run Docker, with no pricier instance type to switch to.
  • Network rules and more regions. Blaxel can lock a sandbox to chosen domains and paths, and runs in London and Frankfurt as well as the US.

Use Agent 37 when

you host one mostly idle assistant per customer in the US and want the lowest hourly rate, with ready agent templates and a chat API.

  • Much lower hourly rates. For agents that run all month: our always-on scenario comes to $12 on Agent 37 against $120 on Blaxel.
  • Ready agents with a chat API. Agent 37 starts an instance from Hermes, OpenClaw, Claude Code, Codex and other templates, and gives each one a chat API.
  • A VM type with KVM when you need it. Agent 37's VM type adds Docker and /dev/kvm, with a ready Android template, which Blaxel's microVMs cannot offer.

Where bochka fits

Blaxel and Agent 37 are both built around sandboxes that sleep when idle. If your agents do hours of real work instead, like installs, builds, tests, Docker and emulators, bochka gives each one a whole Linux machine with a real disk and a faster CPU. It also forks running machines and keeps your keys outside for any API, in the EU.

A whole Linux machine in every sandbox

Blaxel has no /dev/kvm and no native SSH, so an Android emulator never starts. On Agent 37, Docker and KVM need the VM type at 2.5 times the compute rate, and it still has no init system.

Fork a machine while it runs

Agent 37 has no fork, and backups only restore onto the same instance, so each try rebuilds its state from the start. Blaxel's fork is in private preview, and its files sit in memory unless you attach a volume at creation.

A faster CPU

bochka ran 26.69 runs per second against Blaxel's 19.48, so every build and test waits about 1.4 times as long on Blaxel. Agent 37 publishes no score, and steady speed there means its Performance type at 4 times the rate.

Use bochka when your agents do real work for hours: builds, tests, Docker and emulators on a full VM with a real disk, a faster CPU, forks of running machines and keys kept outside for any API. Compare it one to one: bochka vs Blaxel and bochka vs Agent 37.

Questions people ask

Is Blaxel cheaper than Agent 37?

No. Agent 37 is lower in every scenario we priced: $6 against $33 for one coding agent on workdays, $12 against $120 for one that never stops, and $329 against $1,489 for 50 agents in parallel. Blaxel bills only while a connection is open, so a workload that disconnects often pays less than these numbers.

Which is faster, Blaxel or Agent 37?

Blaxel ran 19.48 runs per second on the Node.js build-and-test benchmark at 4 vCPU and 8 GB. Agent 37 has no result on it, so they cannot be compared directly. bochka ran 26.69 on the same benchmark.

Can Blaxel or Agent 37 run Docker?

Blaxel can, with its Docker-in-sandbox image. Agent 37 can only on its VM type, which bills compute at 2.5x; the default gVisor type cannot run a Docker daemon. On bochka, Docker works in every sandbox.

Do Blaxel and Agent 37 keep memory when a sandbox sleeps?

Both do. Blaxel goes to standby seconds after the last connection and wakes in under 25 ms. Agent 37 sleeps after a quiet period you choose and wakes in a few seconds. bochka keeps the disk on stop and reboots on resume.

Can I SSH into Blaxel or Agent 37?

Agent 37 has root SSH through a WebSocket tunnel. Blaxel has no native SSH; you get a terminal through the bl connect command. bochka gives real SSH and systemd in every sandbox.

Where do Blaxel and Agent 37 run?

Blaxel runs in Oregon, North Virginia, London and Frankfurt. Agent 37 runs on dedicated servers in the United States. bochka runs only in the EU, in Germany, Finland and France.

Try bochka

Install the CLI, then run bochka new.

Product preview

More comparisons

Bochka product preview · Pricing, benchmarks and commands are illustrative. Sandbox provisioning is not connected.